SparkQA commented on pull request #28463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28463#issuecomment-625688089
**[Test build #122430 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122430/testReport)**
for PR 28463 at commit
Ngone51 commented on pull request #26440:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26440#issuecomment-625681613
> Right so just send SIGPWR to the worker. Are you saying in standalone mode
you have one worker with multiple executors and you want to decommission a
specific executor?
jiangxb1987 commented on a change in pull request #28444:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28444#discussion_r42198
##
File path: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/status/AppStatusStore.scala
##
@@ -35,8 +36,24 @@ private[spark] class AppStatusStore(
val
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #28477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28477#discussion_r421984688
##
File path:
sql/core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/VectorizedColumnReader.java
##
@@ -102,14 +103,14 @@
// The
cloud-fan commented on a change in pull request #28477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28477#discussion_r421982556
##
File path:
external/avro/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/avro/AvroSerializer.scala
##
@@ -46,17 +47,40 @@ class AvroSerializer(
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28474#issuecomment-625671206
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
yaooqinn edited a comment on pull request #28106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28106#issuecomment-625671160
One more thing, the scope that the `try` can cover is not that large you
have imagined. The cases you listed is actually are all invalid, e.g. sum(a,
b)???
```sql
yaooqinn commented on pull request #28106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28106#issuecomment-625671160
One more things, the scope that the `try` can cover is not that large you
have imagined. The cases you listed is actually are all invalid, e.g. sum(a,
b)???
```sql
--
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28474#issuecomment-625627264
**[Test build #122427 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122427/testReport)**
for PR 28474 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #28474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28474#issuecomment-625671199
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28474#issuecomment-625671199
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
SparkQA commented on pull request #28474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28474#issuecomment-625670916
**[Test build #122427 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122427/testReport)**
for PR 28474 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625666500
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625666493
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625663877
**[Test build #122429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122429/testReport)**
for PR 27944 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625666481
**[Test build #122429 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122429/testReport)**
for PR 27944 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625666493
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #28476:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28476#discussion_r421973198
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala
##
@@ -688,10 +688,11 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
holdenk commented on pull request #28370:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28370#issuecomment-625665354
Jenkins retest this please.
I feel like I’ve seen these particular tests fail before; let’s dig into
what’s causing them to fail.
jiangxb1987 commented on a change in pull request #28476:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28476#discussion_r421973578
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala
##
@@ -688,10 +688,11 @@ private[spark] class
Ngone51 commented on a change in pull request #28476:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28476#discussion_r421973198
##
File path:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala
##
@@ -688,10 +688,11 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
rednaxelafx commented on a change in pull request #28463:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28463#discussion_r421973199
##
File path: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ClosureCleaner.scala
##
@@ -538,43 +604,56 @@ private[spark] object IndylambdaScalaClosures
holdenk commented on pull request #28370:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28370#issuecomment-625664892
Right so just send SIGPWR to the worker. Are you saying in standalone mode
you have one worker with multiple executors and you want to decommission a
specific executor?
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625664443
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625660830
**[Test build #122428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122428/testReport)**
for PR 27944 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625664438
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
SparkQA commented on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625664424
**[Test build #122428 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122428/testReport)**
for PR 27944 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625664438
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
turboFei commented on a change in pull request #26339:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26339#discussion_r421966564
##
File path:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/PartitionedWriteSuite.scala
##
@@ -157,3 +161,49 @@ class PartitionedWriteSuite
SparkQA commented on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625663877
**[Test build #122429 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122429/testReport)**
for PR 27944 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625661311
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625661311
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #27944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27944#issuecomment-625660830
**[Test build #122428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/122428/testReport)**
for PR 27944 at commit
turboFei commented on a change in pull request #26339:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26339#discussion_r421966564
##
File path:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/PartitionedWriteSuite.scala
##
@@ -157,3 +161,49 @@ class PartitionedWriteSuite
stijndehaes commented on pull request #28423:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28423#issuecomment-625656337
@holdenk @dongjoon-hyun I have tested this code in production and it works.
I have a couple of jobs that take roughly 4 hours to finish, these all failed
without the fix
zhengruifeng commented on pull request #28473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28473#issuecomment-625650251
Merged to master
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
yaooqinn edited a comment on pull request #28106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28106#issuecomment-625648533
I see the concerns.
The behavior of `try` here is simply that it wraps a `try-catch` for its
root child expression. And the meanings of `try` will be spread based
yaooqinn commented on pull request #28106:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28106#issuecomment-625648533
I see the concerns.
The behavior of `try` here is simply that it wraps a `try-catch` for its
root child expression. And the meanings of `try` will be spread based on how
301 - 338 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
