tgravescs commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality
wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-590495995
sorry was out on vacation. What is all left that you haven't done based on
tgravescs commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality
wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-581922713
I'll take a closer look later, I think its fine not to support mesos fine
tgravescs commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality
wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-580832881
@bmarcott will you be able to update this?
--
tgravescs commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality
wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-578180700
its a case by case basis. While we don't like adding more configs and cod
tgravescs commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality
wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-577746374
So the conditions would be like:
offer 1 resource that was rejected
tgravescs commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality
wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-576869577
yes its fine not to do any minor changes until we decide on design.
I'm
tgravescs commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality
wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-574796813
so please update the description with information from the other PR. The