Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-149457452
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-149457470
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-149458541
**[Test build #43968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43968/consoleFull)**
for PR 8621 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-149451946
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-149397394
If I understand correct, the `PromotePrecision` only will be used for type
coercion, which is in the analysis phase, and remove it in optimize phase
should be
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-148502689
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-148502712
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-148561118
cc @yhuai
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#discussion_r42198441
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -732,11 +732,12 @@ object SimplifyCasts extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-148504866
[Test build #43804 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43804/consoleFull)
for PR 8621 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-148537980
[Test build #43804 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43804/console)
for PR 8621 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-148538141
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-148538143
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-140354172
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user adrian-wang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-140244187
@chenghao-intel
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-138124030
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-138124031
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-138123997
[Test build #42070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42070/console)
for PR 8621 at commit
GitHub user adrian-wang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621
[SPARK-10463] [SQL] remove PromotePrecision during optimization
PromotePrecision is not necessary after HiveTypeCoercion done.
Jira:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-138051536
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-138108136
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8621#issuecomment-138109217
[Test build #42070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42070/consoleFull)
for PR 8621 at commit
23 matches
Mail list logo
