Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167859672
Thanks for putting the effort into this @tedyu. It did move us forward in
the sense that now we know we can't use Kryo for serializing task results. I'm
going to clo
Github user tedyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167855990
What first two days of work are you referring to? The problem is we just
can't use Kryo for serializing task results because there might be unregistered
classes. Bec
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167802141
I think the first two days' work aligns with SPARK-12414.
Is it possible to keep that (without modification to KryoSerializer and the
new test) ?
---
If your pr
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48513944
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResultGetterSuite.scala ---
@@ -81,6 +81,16 @@ class TaskResultGetterSuite extends SparkFunSuite w
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167673871
As @zsxwing pointed out, the existing unit tests are not sufficient because
they didn't catch the fact that `ShuffleReadMetrics` et al must also be
registered. This
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48511217
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -109,6 +111,9 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
kryo
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48508806
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -109,6 +111,9 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
kryo.re
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48507734
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -109,6 +111,9 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
kryo.regi
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48507496
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -109,6 +111,9 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
kryo.re
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48458317
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiverSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,7 +222,7 @@ class HeartbeatReceiverSuite
} else {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167101252
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167101251
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167101101
**[Test build #48304 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48304/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://g
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167086261
```
sbt.ForkMain$ForkError:
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedDueToTimeoutException: The code passed to
eventually never returned normally. Attempted 209 times over
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167081572
**[Test build #48304 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48304/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://gi
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167079477
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167061071
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167061036
**[Test build #48288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48288/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167061069
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167047677
**[Test build #48288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48288/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://gi
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167046527
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167046506
```
[info] PostgresIntegrationSuite:
[info] Exception encountered when attempting to run a suite with class
name: org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.PostgresIntegrationSuit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167044665
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167044664
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167044643
**[Test build #48283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48283/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039836
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039814
**[Test build #48279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48279/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`5011926`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167039837
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167038607
**[Test build #48283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48283/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`a4173eb`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167033459
**[Test build #48279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48279/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`5011926`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167030489
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167030488
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167030479
**[Test build #48278 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48278/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`ac0199a`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167028329
**[Test build #48278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48278/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`ac0199a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167025356
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167025357
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167025330
**[Test build #48275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48275/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`846b939`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167024446
**[Test build #48275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48275/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`846b939`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167022107
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167022108
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167022099
**[Test build #48273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48273/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`710dc44`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167019833
**[Test build #48273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48273/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`710dc44`](https://gi
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167018650
Here was why I implemented equals for Map (from #48257):
{code}
[info] - Bug: SPARK-12415 *** FAILED *** (3 milliseconds)
[info] java.nio.HeapByteBuffer[pos=0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167016785
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167016754
**[Test build #48257 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48257/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`7cfde71`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167016784
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389780
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer, var
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167015301
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167015302
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167015292
**[Test build #48269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48269/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`4b5657b`](https://g
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389541
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer, var
accu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167014373
**[Test build #48269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48269/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`4b5657b`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-167014071
LGTM except some nits. Thanks a lot for fixing this @tedyu
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389325
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/HeartbeatReceiverSuite.scala
---
@@ -220,7 +222,7 @@ class HeartbeatReceiverSuite
} else {
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389313
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer, var
ac
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48389119
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -215,6 +215,18 @@ class TaskMetrics extends Serializable {
input
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48385365
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -215,6 +215,18 @@ class TaskMetrics extends Serializable {
inputMet
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48384718
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,23 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer,
var a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166999771
**[Test build #48257 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48257/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`7cfde71`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48372722
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializerSuite.scala ---
@@ -154,6 +155,19 @@ class KryoSerializerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48372644
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,26 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer,
var a
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48372093
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,26 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer,
var a
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166972579
The rest of it looks OK. @zsxwing can you take another pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48371257
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/KryoSerializer.scala ---
@@ -109,6 +111,9 @@ class KryoSerializer(conf: SparkConf)
kryo
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48371027
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskResult.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,26 @@ class DirectTaskResult[T](var valueBytes: ByteBuffer,
va
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#discussion_r48370672
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/TaskMetrics.scala
---
@@ -215,6 +215,19 @@ class TaskMetrics extends Serializable {
input
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166387628
@andrewor14 @zsxwing
Please take another look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166387458
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166387455
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166387289
**[Test build #48119 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48119/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`bc7699c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166358959
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166358956
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166358855
**[Test build #48119 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48119/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`bc7699c`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166154566
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166154468
**[Test build #48087 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48087/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`86dbca8`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166154567
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166149468
**[Test build #48087 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48087/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`86dbca8`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166070595
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166070591
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166070476
**[Test build #48070 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48070/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`c9ad494`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166068982
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166068983
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166068971
**[Test build #48068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48068/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`facf246`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166067939
**[Test build #48070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48070/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`c9ad494`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166061058
**[Test build #48068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48068/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`facf246`](https://gi
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166060830
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166060825
HeartbeatReceiverSuite.'expire dead hosts' failed
Doesn't seem to be related to the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166059917
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166059915
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166059903
**[Test build #48067 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48067/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`facf246`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166055164
**[Test build #48067 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48067/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`facf246`](https://gi
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166052576
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166046525
**[Test build #2239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2239/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`facf246`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166046523
**[Test build #2239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2239/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`facf246`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166035113
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166035114
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166035102
**[Test build #48059 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48059/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`b65aeb6`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166034111
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10368#issuecomment-166034107
**[Test build #48063 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48063/consoleFull)**
for PR 10368 at commit
[`facf246`](https://gi
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
