Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61605293
Thanks, I kept fixing the conflicts, but missed this one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61552399
[Test build #22826 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22826/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61555332
[Test build #22827 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22827/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61567627
[Test build #22826 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22826/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61567632
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61569440
[Test build #22827 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22827/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61569447
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61588212
I'm going to merge this into 1.2 in order to avoid merge conflicts when
backporting future bugfixes to that branch. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61605039
There was a minor conflict with an MLlib change (it added two new lines of
additional code before your change to `sql.py`), but I fixed it up myself on
merge and ran
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#discussion_r19714030
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ class LinearRegressionModel(LinearRegressionModelBase):
# train_func should
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#discussion_r19715173
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -449,12 +445,11 @@ def intersection(self, other):
def _reserialize(self, serializer=None):
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#discussion_r19715186
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -1216,51 +1216,6 @@ def test_reserialization(self):
result5 = sorted(self.sc.sequenceFile(basepath +
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61442032
Could you fix up the merge conflicts here? Barring that, this LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#discussion_r19719423
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -1216,51 +1216,6 @@ def test_reserialization(self):
result5 = sorted(self.sc.sequenceFile(basepath +
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61313322
[Test build #22625 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22625/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#discussion_r19687663
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/regression.py ---
@@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ class LinearRegressionModel(LinearRegressionModelBase):
# train_func should
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#discussion_r19687879
--- Diff: python/pyspark/rdd.py ---
@@ -449,12 +445,11 @@ def intersection(self, other):
def _reserialize(self, serializer=None):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61317728
This is a really nice change. With this change, we'll end up wrapping
individual objects in `Batch` wrappers when batching is disabled, but I don't
think this will
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#discussion_r19688764
--- Diff: python/pyspark/tests.py ---
@@ -1216,51 +1216,6 @@ def test_reserialization(self):
result5 = sorted(self.sc.sequenceFile(basepath +
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61331876
**[Test build #22625 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22625/consoleFull)**
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61340488
[Test build #22655 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22655/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61346579
[Test build #22655 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22655/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61346583
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61350038
[Test build #22668 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22668/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61354458
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61354455
[Test build #22668 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22668/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61356801
[Test build #502 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/502/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61358467
[Test build #502 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/502/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61026401
[Test build #22495 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22495/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61033560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-61033556
[Test build #22495 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22495/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60842962
[Test build #22384 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22384/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60843352
@JoshRosen Do you have time to look at this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60853899
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60853893
[Test build #22384 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22384/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60474199
[Test build #22200 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22200/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60474201
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60474496
[Test build #22203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22203/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60474608
**[Test build #426 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/426/consoleFull)**
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60474657
**[Test build #428 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/428/consoleFull)**
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60476034
[Test build #22203 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22203/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60476035
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60487083
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60487317
[Test build #22217 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22217/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60490565
[Test build #22217 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22217/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60490568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60351167
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60351159
[Test build #22117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22117/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60353573
[Test build #22129 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22129/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60354054
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60354049
[Test build #22120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22120/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60360411
[Test build #22129 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22129/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60360419
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60437321
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60437879
[Test build #22156 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22156/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60446626
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60446619
[Test build #22156 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22156/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60469206
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60469302
[Test build #22187 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22187/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60471543
**[Test build #22187 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22187/consoleFull)**
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60471545
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60472391
[Test build #426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/426/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60472430
[Test build #428 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/428/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2920#issuecomment-60472725
[Test build #22200 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/22200/consoleFull)
for PR 2920 at commit
65 matches
Mail list logo
