Github user adamjk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-164703283
Is this being backported to 1.5.x?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150337486
LGTM, so I'm going to merge this into master. Should this be backported to
1.5.x or any earlier releases?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150091423
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150091422
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150091343
**[Test build #44113 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44113/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`3383473`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150068875
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150068962
**[Test build #44113 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44113/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`3383473`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150068858
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150068746
Yes, true, actually SPARK-7749 provides an example of Hive metastore
backend empty partition table, then we will not detect any partition column
values.
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-150021131
@chenghao-intel, it looks like this most recent test failure is legitimate:
```
assertion failed: Actual partitioning column names did not match
user-speci
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149959480
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149959477
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149959310
**[Test build #44066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44066/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`bdee89e`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149922732
**[Test build #44066 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44066/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`bdee89e`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149919423
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149919454
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149911447
Thank you @JoshRosen so much for the detail review, but seems bug exists,
I'd like to solve it myself soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149785524
@chenghao-intel, thanks a bunch for updating this; the current version of
this patch is a lot easier to understand and I'm happy with how clean the code
turned out. I
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42584080
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -510,21 +510,39 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest e
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42584058
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42584044
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42584024
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42583983
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42583969
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42583944
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42583857
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149783377
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149783376
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149783351
**[Test build #44040 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44040/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`9f08f76`](https://git
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42583415
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42583431
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/interfaces.scala ---
@@ -544,11 +544,35 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelation
private[sql](mayb
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149781986
@JoshRosen I've updated the code, should be more straightforward and clean
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149781507
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149781506
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149781486
**[Test build #44038 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44038/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`2cc93da`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149781430
**[Test build #44040 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44040/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`9f08f76`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149779487
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149779455
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149777383
**[Test build #44038 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/44038/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`2cc93da`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149776551
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149776594
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42575993
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -236,15 +241,22 @@ private[sql] object Par
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42575628
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -134,17 +137,38 @@ private[sql] object Par
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42533868
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -134,17 +137,38 @@ private[sql] object Partitio
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149627957
**[Test build #43984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43984/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`7f2da8c`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149628397
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149628393
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42509891
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -236,15 +241,22 @@ private[sql] object Partitio
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42509765
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetPartitionDiscoverySuite.scala
---
@@ -101,11 +118,13 @@ cl
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149598558
@JoshRosen I've updated the unit test also by adding an `Append` operation,
without this PR, it will throws exception as I described in the jira
(https://issues.a
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42506907
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -236,15 +241,22 @@ private[sql] object Par
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149591384
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149591577
**[Test build #43984 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43984/consoleFull)**
for PR 8026 at commit
[`7f2da8c`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149591364
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42451442
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -458,6 +458,8 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTes
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42451397
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTes
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42451143
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -236,15 +241,22 @@ private[sql] object Par
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149413572
Thank you @JoshRosen , I will pick up this PR as some details I almost
forgot. But definitely, the ignored test cases will fail without this PR
previously, not su
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149406766
I just tried testing a build where I _only_ re-enabled the ignored test and
changed nothing else. In this case, the test still passed. This makes me wonder
whether the
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42447350
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetPartitionDiscoverySuite.scala
---
@@ -101,11 +118,13 @@ class P
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42447317
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -458,6 +458,8 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest ext
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42447228
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -236,15 +241,22 @@ private[sql] object Partitio
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42446094
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest ext
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-149390928
@chenghao-intel, just to clarify: I noticed that your final approach
involved pushing an expected data type down into the method named
`inferPartitionColumValue`. I'm
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r42445776
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -236,15 +241,22 @@ private[sql] object Partitio
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#discussion_r41919664
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/hadoopFsRelationSuites.scala
---
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ abstract class HadoopFsRelationTest extend
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132480407
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132480410
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132480287
[Test build #41214 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41214/console)
for PR 8026 at commit
[`cda059f`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132455893
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132455892
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132455872
[Test build #41202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41202/console)
for PR 8026 at commit
[`f68d827`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132451174
[Test build #41214 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41214/consoleFull)
for PR 8026 at commit
[`cda059f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132450499
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132450511
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132450163
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132447554
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132447550
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132447476
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132447507
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132446425
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132446390
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132446424
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132445340
[Test build #41211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41211/consoleFull)
for PR 8026 at commit
[`cda059f`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132445375
[Test build #41211 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41211/console)
for PR 8026 at commit
[`cda059f`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132445384
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132445382
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-13249
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-13240
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132444093
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132444085
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132431832
[Test build #41202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41202/consoleFull)
for PR 8026 at commit
[`f68d827`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132430775
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-132430765
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-128643963
A summary of my offline discussion with @chenghao-intel:
The real problem here is that the partition column types of the newly
refreshed partition spec don't m
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-128619293
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-128616385
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-128616376
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8026#issuecomment-128615201
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
