Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-135574246
merging with master and branch-1.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-135574233
I'll go ahead and merge this and ask @feynmanliang to make any needed
updates when he sends a PR for the linear regression summary docs. Thanks!
---
If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37896794
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -23,20 +23,41 @@ displayTitle: a href=ml-guide.htmlML/a - Linear
Methods
\]`
-In MLlib, we
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37896812
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37896801
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37896809
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37896807
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-134685351
Done with review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-134449756
LGTM
CC @jkbradley this is blocking SPARK-9905 so do you mind reviewing when you
have a chance? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132125000
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132124847
[Test build #41096 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41096/console)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132124998
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132083744
@feynmanliang I have moved the guide to `ml-linear-models`. Can you give
another pass?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132083259
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132084922
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132084903
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132087124
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132086638
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132086610
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132086612
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132088562
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132088488
[Test build #41094 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41094/console)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132083150
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132087134
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132088707
[Test build #41096 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41096/consoleFull)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132088561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132085620
[Test build #41094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41094/consoleFull)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132309366
Cool LGTM, @jkbradley for final pass
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37336156
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132315680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37337556
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132315683
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132323049
@feynmanliang Actually I'm not very convinced that coupling these with
existing code is the way to go. We could have a `docs/ml-summary.md` in the
future with
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37331604
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
+Once
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37333263
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
+Once
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132315466
[Test build #41151 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41151/console)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132311220
[Test build #41151 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41151/consoleFull)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37335210
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37335316
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37336590
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132306453
@MechCoder I sent you a PR, please merge if you like the changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37336485
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132308590
I have merged your changes. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132308625
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132308575
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37335793
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37336212
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132343523
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37345734
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37345587
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132348205
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132348201
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37347155
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37347701
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132344168
[Test build #41162 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41162/consoleFull)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132333581
Having a `ml-summary.md` would lead to quite a bit of repeated
documentation; we would have to supply model training example code in both the
model's description
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132341432
You are right.
But I thought that the example code such as extracting the training loss,
and common metrics would be repeated across some classification and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132343547
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37349237
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132348051
[Test build #41162 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41162/console)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132350267
Okay. But he had to told something else in that PR discussion :p. I do
agree that doing model.binarySUmmary is much nearer than
model.asInstanceOf[]â¦
On
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37347889
--- Diff: docs/ml-linear-methods.md ---
@@ -118,12 +133,114 @@ lrModel = lr.fit(training)
print(Weights: + str(lrModel.weights))
print(Intercept:
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255384
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255388
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37256585
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132009598
I think this should be part of the linear methods section, not part of the
main ML guide. Once we have summary support in more model types, then we can
mention it in
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255300
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255796
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37256629
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37256686
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132015185
:+1: to @jkbradley 's suggestion; my apologies for not thinking of that and
the misleading JIRA task description. I've updated the JIRA to reflect this.
---
If
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37254999
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132016183
@MechCoder I am working on LinearRegressionSummary docs (SPARK-9905) and I
think we should communicate about where these docs should go. What do you think
about
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255149
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
--- End
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255082
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255190
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132019803
@feynmanliang That organization sounds good, if the summary examples can
make use of previous basic examples (and avoid copying code). Another option
would be to
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255160
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
--- End
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37255176
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
--- End
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-132070173
@feynmanliang All right, I shall reorganize the code right now. Could you
wait for the LinearRegressionSummary till this is merged? It would make things
simpler.
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37265276
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,153 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
+Once
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131523642
[Test build #40988 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40988/consoleFull)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131523608
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131523605
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131525240
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131525225
[Test build #40988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/40988/console)
for PR 8197 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131525241
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131523407
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131523403
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131524525
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131524527
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37140446
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,146 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user MechCoder commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37141832
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,141 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
+Once
Github user feynmanliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#discussion_r37140382
--- Diff: docs/ml-guide.md ---
@@ -801,6 +801,141 @@ jsc.stop();
/div
+## Examples: Summaries for LogisticRegression.
+
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131491134
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131491137
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user feynmanliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131491133
Lgtm pending tests
@mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131491136
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8197#issuecomment-131491132
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
