Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581#discussion_r66527669
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -434,24 +436,21 @@ abstract class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581#discussion_r66525197
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -549,21 +552,22 @@ case class
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581#discussion_r66525010
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -434,24 +436,21 @@ abstract class
GitHub user hvanhovell opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13581
[SPARK-14321][SQL] Reduce date format cost and string-to-date cost in date
functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The current implementations of `UnixTime` and
