Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
**[Test build #61979 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61979/consoleFull)**
for PR 14104 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61980/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61979/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14105
**[Test build #61981 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61981/consoleFull)**
for PR 14105 at commit
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70074963
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70075370
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
**[Test build #61982 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61982/consoleFull)**
for PR 14088 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831#discussion_r70079878
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ case class DescribeDatabaseCommand(
case
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831
it would be nice to test using purge actually does a purge, ie nothing is
in the trash afterwards. I don't see any easy way to do that, though -- maybe
using
Github user k0ala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1306
FWIW, I frequently have this use case and would love a `span` on RDD.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14049
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14065#discussion_r70074645
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/token/ServiceTokenProvider.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70075273
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61982/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
**[Test build #61983 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61983/consoleFull)**
for PR 14008 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14049
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088#discussion_r70073453
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -743,6 +735,14 @@ object ApplicationMaster extends Logging {
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
minor comment change otherwise looks good. thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
@petermaxlee are you sure that we shouldn't implement this using
`RuntimeReplaceable`, using NewInstance -> Invoke or a StaticInvoke? The added
value is that this support code generation, and
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
yea LGTM. And please make sure the benchmark results are up to date, as the
code has changed a lot of times.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14105
[SPARK-16376] [WEBUI] [Spark web UI]:HTTP ERROR 500 when using rest api
"/applications/[app-id]/jobs" if array "stageIds" is empty
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Avoid
Github user janplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
cc @cloud-fan Thank you.
I have resolved conflicts with master and done some code style fixes as you
suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user sharkdtu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088#discussion_r70076189
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -743,6 +735,14 @@ object ApplicationMaster extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
**[Test build #61982 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61982/consoleFull)**
for PR 14088 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61976/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068#discussion_r70059298
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -426,16 +426,23 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14097
Seems reasonable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user bonitao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11748
Amazing. Thanks a lot @JoshRosen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14087
**[Test build #61976 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61976/consoleFull)**
for PR 14087 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831#discussion_r70065994
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -249,7 +249,18 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831#discussion_r70066014
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/VersionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -366,7 +377,20 @@ class VersionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
@cloud-fan , thank you for a lot of great review comments. This PR looks
much better than the first commit.
I updated the description of this PR. Is it fine with you?
---
If your project is set
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
@phalodi it's a bot, not a person.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
**[Test build #61980 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61980/consoleFull)**
for PR 14104 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
**[Test build #61979 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61979/consoleFull)**
for PR 14104 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
@cloud-fan I would appreciate it if you could review this again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61978 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61978/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012#discussion_r70055094
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1135,11 +1146,16 @@ object PushDownPredicate
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61978/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jurriaan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13374
@rxin Sorry for the confusion, fixed it :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
**[Test build #61977 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61977/consoleFull)**
for PR 13680 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14104
**[Test build #61980 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61980/consoleFull)**
for PR 14104 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14068
It does make sense. Please make a JIRA and connect this though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61977/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831#discussion_r70062869
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLCommandSuite.scala
---
@@ -776,21 +778,29 @@ class DDLCommandSuite extends
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831
you could avoid changing all the callsites by adding a default of `purge =
false`, but I'm guessing that is discouraged in the sql code (since eg. there
is not default for `ignoreIfNotExists`).
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
**[Test build #61983 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61983/consoleFull)**
for PR 14008 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61983/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012#discussion_r70097418
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1135,11 +1146,16 @@ object PushDownPredicate
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075#discussion_r70095195
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -82,6 +82,34 @@ class DefaultSource
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14071#discussion_r70096412
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -45,35 +45,28 @@ case class CatalogFunction(
*/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14105
**[Test build #61981 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61981/consoleFull)**
for PR 14105 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075
**[Test build #61984 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61984/consoleFull)**
for PR 14075 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
**[Test build #61985 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61985/consoleFull)**
for PR 14012 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14105
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14105
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61981/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user janplus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
It seems failed the
`org.apache.spark.sql.sources.CreateTableAsSelectSuite.create a table, drop it
and create another one with the same name` test which is irrelevant with this
PR.
Maybe we
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13374
**[Test build #3171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3171/consoleFull)**
for PR 13374 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14106
**[Test build #61986 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61986/consoleFull)**
for PR 14106 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
If you mean the following mention, what @rxin said was not about the return
type. It's about `function` and `method` name, isn't it? Is there any other
mentions about `String`?
> Majority
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
**[Test build #61989 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61989/consoleFull)**
for PR 14048 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075
**[Test build #61990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61990/consoleFull)**
for PR 14075 at commit
Github user lovexi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70109683
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -143,4 +179,26 @@ private void
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61984/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
**[Test build #61987 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61987/consoleFull)**
for PR 14008 at commit
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14093#discussion_r70105908
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -349,12 +349,19 @@ void forceSorterToSpill() throws IOException {
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70106457
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14048
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14093
**[Test build #61988 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61988/consoleFull)**
for PR 14093 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14088
The comment can be easily replaced by a unit test; then the PR builder will
break is someone ignores the comment...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075#discussion_r70108301
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -82,6 +82,32 @@ class DefaultSource
}
}
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70109475
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075
**[Test build #61984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61984/consoleFull)**
for PR 14075 at commit
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831
minor comments andrequest for some extra tests, but overall looks good
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969
@hvanhovell in its current form we'd need some refactoring to StaticInvoke
to work with this, due to Hive allowing both static invocation and dynamic
invocation.
Also - does
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14008
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14075#discussion_r70106028
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -82,6 +82,32 @@ class DefaultSource
}
}
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70106044
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70106490
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14106
[SPARK-16448] RemoveAliasOnlyProject should not remove alias with metadata
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Alias` with metadata is not a no-op and we should not
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14106
cc @viirya @yhuai @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13969#discussion_r70106095
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Reflect.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user mgummelt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14078
I'll get back to you before end of day
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user lovexi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70110638
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -93,18 +113,34 @@ protected void
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14093#discussion_r70111252
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/sort/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -349,12 +349,19 @@ void forceSorterToSpill() throws IOException
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
**[Test build #61985 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61985/consoleFull)**
for PR 14012 at commit
Github user lovexi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14080#discussion_r70111868
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -64,6 +75,10 @@ public
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/61985/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14012
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13831
> it would be nice to test using purge actually does a purge
None of the tests run on actual HDFS cluster, so I doubt that would be
possible without a lot more work...
---
If your project
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14034#discussion_r70118783
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
1 - 100 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
