Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Let me try to add Java one and fix comments more tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16848
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100089611
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
**[Test build #72590 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72590/testReport)**
for PR 16856 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856#discussion_r100089351
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -77,9 +76,9 @@ In addition, if you wish to access an HDFS cluster, you
need to add a dependency
Finally, you
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72590/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100081170
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100082372
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1764,4 +1769,125 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100086037
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72588/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16848
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72589 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72589/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100104738
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -298,22 +312,22 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804#discussion_r100085484
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcSourceSuite.scala ---
@@ -162,6 +162,40 @@ abstract class OrcSuite extends QueryTest
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
**[Test build #72587 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72587/testReport)**
for PR 16804 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72587/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user GavinGavinNo1 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
[SPARK-13931] Resolve stage hanging up problem in a particular case
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When function 'executorLost' is invoked in class 'TaskSetManager',
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
**[Test build #72590 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72590/testReport)**
for PR 16856 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72591 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72591/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100098008
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1764,4 +1769,125 @@ class JsonSuite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16804
**[Test build #72587 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72587/testReport)**
for PR 16804 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
**[Test build #72588 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72588/testReport)**
for PR 16854 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72589/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user vitillo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16857
[SPARK-19517][SS] KafkaSource fails to initialize partition offsets
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch fixes a bug in `KafkaSource` with the (de)serialization
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100100641
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/input/PortableDataStream.scala ---
@@ -194,5 +195,8 @@ class PortableDataStream(
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
**[Test build #3564 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3564/testReport)**
for PR 16853 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
**[Test build #72588 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72588/testReport)**
for PR 16854 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user GavinGavinNo1 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
[SPARK-19516][DOC] update public doc to use SparkSession instead of
SparkContext
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After Spark 2.0, `SparkSession` becomes the new
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r100089218
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntrySuite.scala ---
@@ -128,6 +128,25 @@ class ConfigEntrySuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
cc @sameeragarwal @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16852
**[Test build #3565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3565/testReport)**
for PR 16852 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72589 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72589/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72591/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72591 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72591/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100097749
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonDataSource.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
GitHub user GavinGavinNo1 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
[SPARK-13931] Resolve stage hanging up problem in a particular case
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When function 'executorLost' is invoked in class
Github user GavinGavinNo1 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user GavinGavinNo1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11760
@kayousterhout I got some problem with git conflict. So I create a new
branch and a new pull request. You may refer to
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16855. And I close this pull
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100103739
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -227,66 +267,71 @@ class JacksonParser(
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16689
@felixcheung @titicaca Just to make sure I understand, collect on timestamp
was getting `c("POSIXct", "POSIXt")` even before this change ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100099791
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -31,10 +31,17 @@ import
Github user NathanHowell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100101464
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -160,7 +164,17 @@ public void writeTo(OutputStream out)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16831
**[Test build #3562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3562/testReport)**
for PR 16831 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16386#discussion_r100083481
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/json/JsonSuite.scala
---
@@ -1764,4 +1769,125 @@ class JsonSuite extends
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16854
[SPARK-15463][SQL] Add an API to load DataFrame from Dataset[String]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to add an API that loads `DataFrame` from
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856#discussion_r100089566
--- Diff: docs/programming-guide.md ---
@@ -244,13 +239,13 @@ use IPython, set the `PYSPARK_DRIVER_PYTHON` variable
to `ipython` when running
$
Github user lw-lin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736#discussion_r100089378
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConfEntrySuite.scala
---
@@ -164,6 +164,18 @@ class SQLConfEntrySuite extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16852
**[Test build #3565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3565/testReport)**
for PR 16852 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72592 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72592/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15193
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Thank you for merging, @srowen .
Thank you for review, @vanzin , @liancheng , @jaceklaskowski , too!
I'm watching the build system on mockito hotfix. I believe it will become
stabler
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15193
Thanks for the patch @yaooqinn . As per comments for `getValueRow`, because
`getValueRow(id)` is always called after `getKeyRow(id)` with the same id, we
use `getValueFromKey(id) to retrieve value row
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72596 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72596/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
I removed those lines, too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
**[Test build #72592 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72592/testReport)**
for PR 16736 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72592/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Amending the PR again to fix new dependency conflict in spark/pom.xml.
Thanks again for taking the time to review this, @brkyvz and @srowen. Please
let me know if you feel any additional changes are
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
@viirya Addressed your comment, also fixed another bug (updated PR
description).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
@srowen Could you review this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100135299
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100136174
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_utils.R ---
@@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ test_that("basenameSansExtFromUrl", {
x <-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16850
**[Test build #3563 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3563/testReport)**
for PR 16850 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
**[Test build #72594 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72594/testReport)**
for PR 16844 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72594/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16387
@samkum the code is in this PR! Just revert the last two commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100131333
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100134410
--- Diff: dev/run-tests.py ---
@@ -505,14 +505,14 @@ def main():
# if we're on the Amplab Jenkins build servers setup variables
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72597 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72597/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72593 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Looks like Jenkins is failing to build any recent PR due to the following
error:
```[error] Could not find hadoop2.3 in the list. Valid options are
['hadoop2.6', 'hadoop2.7']```
I
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858#discussion_r100133896
--- Diff: dev/run-tests-jenkins.py ---
@@ -165,12 +165,6 @@ def main():
if "test-maven" in ghprb_pull_title:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16844
**[Test build #3566 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3566/testReport)**
for PR 16844 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16664#discussion_r100127337
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -218,7 +247,14 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
[SPARK-19464][BUILD][HOTFIX] run-tests should use hadoop2.6
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After SPARK-19464, SparkPullRequestBuilder fails because it still
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16858
**[Test build #72595 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72595/testReport)**
for PR 16858 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> For better user experience, we should automatically infer the schema and
write it back to metastore, if there is no case-sensitive table schema in
metastore. This has the cost of detection the need
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100138241
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100138230
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16495
Thanks @mhmoudr
As far as the stress test, I'd recommend posting instructions as a Github
gist and linking it to wherever you post results on JIRA or a PR. We wouldn't
want to add a model (a
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16776#discussion_r100138206
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameStatFunctions.scala ---
@@ -63,44 +63,49 @@ final class DataFrameStatFunctions
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16736
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16853
**[Test build #3564 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3564/testReport)**
for PR 16853 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72593 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72593/
Test FAILed.
---
1 - 100 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
