Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20036
**[Test build #85196 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85196/testReport)**
for PR 20036 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
**[Test build #4019 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4019/testReport)**
for PR 20016 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037
Thanks! Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user chetkhatri commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158113948
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -104,6 +103,60 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19788#discussion_r158124202
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/ExternalShuffleBlockHandler.java
---
@@ -203,22 +203,23 @@ private
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19876#discussion_r158126871
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/ReadWrite.scala ---
@@ -126,15 +180,69 @@ abstract class MLWriter extends BaseReadWrite with
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20039
[SPARK-22850][core] Ensure queued events are delivered to all event queues.
The code in LiveListenerBus was queueing events before start in the
queues themselves; so in situations like the
Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032#discussion_r158129065
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -217,7
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018
Adding other contributor of the same file for review. cc\
@cloud-fan
@aokolnychyi
@liancheng
@HyukjinKwon
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20012
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
I found a few problems that this PR can ideally solve. If this is not
available soon, I will use workaround in upcoming PRs.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
**[Test build #4019 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4019/testReport)**
for PR 20016 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19035
@figo77 Could you close it?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20033
**[Test build #4017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4017/testReport)**
for PR 20033 at commit
Github user chetkhatri commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
@srowen Thank you for re-run, now it passes all.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85195/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
Ok I did some local testing with these changes and pyarrow 0.8.0 with
different combinations of Python and Pandas:
**python 3.6.3, pandas 0.19.2**
ERROR:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85203 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85203/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19940
**[Test build #85202 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85202/testReport)**
for PR 19940 at commit
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19993
To make it available for other classes, we need to support checking for
both `fit` and `transform`, that means we also need a sample input Dataset, so
we may have to add the explicit test in each of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85197/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20029
This indeed is the primary change as it's open vs master.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19989 had some concerns about whether this
affects correctness though?
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20038
**[Test build #85201 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85201/testReport)**
for PR 20038 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20012
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19813
I agree that string replacement is too dangerous (e.g. `a + 1 = a + 10`
with `a + 1`).
How about a contract with adding assertions?
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19978
@MikhailErofeev was the conclusion here that you just want to set
spark.taskMetrics.trackUpdatedBlockStatuses in your case?
---
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19876#discussion_r158113236
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -994,6 +998,38 @@ class LinearRegressionSuite
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20037
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20035
**[Test build #85198 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85198/testReport)**
for PR 20035 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20016
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
Within the allocator's control loop, it's all asynchronous requests being
made for executor pods from the k8s API, so, each loop doesn't take very long.
If a user were to set a very low value for
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
**[Test build #85208 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85208/testReport)**
for PR 20032 at commit
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
> (And what happens if set to 0/-ve ?)
We have a check preventing that in the option itself. The value should be
strictly greater than 0 ms.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19940
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85202/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158138974
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousDataSourceRDDIter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158134853
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousDataSourceRDDIter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158116796
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/EpochCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158135254
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousDataSourceRDDIter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158136868
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousDataSourceRDDIter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158139103
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousDataSourceRDDIter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158116511
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/EpochCoordinator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19940
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20038
**[Test build #85201 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85201/testReport)**
for PR 20038 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19876
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85207/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19876
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19876
**[Test build #85207 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85207/testReport)**
for PR 19876 at commit
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032#discussion_r158148895
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -86,7
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20038
Retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158154378
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/decimals.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+-- tests for decimals handling in operations
+--
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
**[Test build #85214 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85214/testReport)**
for PR 20032 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20040
**[Test build #85213 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85213/testReport)**
for PR 20040 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
Thank you for pining me, @mgaido91 . The approach of PR looks good to me.
BTW, do we need to borrow more Hive 2.2 test cases?
---
Github user joseph-torres commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158156114
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+/*
+
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158133877
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
//
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85208/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
In am generally in favor of following the SQL standard. How about we do
this. Let's make the standard behavior the default, and add a flag to revert to
the old behavior. This allows us to ease
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19993
**[Test build #85209 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85209/testReport)**
for PR 19993 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19993
thanks @hhbyyh, I updated the PR according to your suggestion and previous
comments.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20038
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20038
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85201/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19994
**[Test build #85210 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85210/testReport)**
for PR 19994 at commit
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
thanks for looking at this @hvanhovell. The reasons why I didn't introduce
a configuration variable for this behavior are:
1. As far as I know, currently there is no way to read reliably
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20040
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user foxish commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032
Fixed, thanks for the reviews. @mridulm, the questions about performance
are super helpful for us also to keep track of how we're doing wrt other
cluster managers and wrt user expectations. Thanks!
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023#discussion_r158155039
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1526,15 +1526,15 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19884
**[Test build #85205 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85205/testReport)**
for PR 19884 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158133606
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
//
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20018#discussion_r158134032
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/sql/hive/SparkHiveExample.scala
---
@@ -102,8 +101,63 @@ object SparkHiveExample {
//
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032#discussion_r158149295
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -86,7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19993
**[Test build #85209 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85209/testReport)**
for PR 19993 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20033
Pyspark failures are unrelated. Merging to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20038
**[Test build #85211 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85211/testReport)**
for PR 20038 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20033
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19940
**[Test build #85212 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85212/testReport)**
for PR 19940 at commit
GitHub user easel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20040
[SPARK-22852][BUILD] Exclude -Xlint:unchecked from sbt javadoc flags
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Moves the -Xlint:unchecked flag in the sbt build configuration from
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19993#discussion_r158153277
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/ParamsSuite.scala
---
@@ -430,4 +433,49 @@ object ParamsSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19993#discussion_r158153048
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -249,6 +250,31 @@ object ParamValidators {
def
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19993#discussion_r158154050
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/ParamsSuite.scala
---
@@ -430,4 +433,49 @@ object ParamsSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
Github user foxish commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032#discussion_r158154833
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -86,7
Github user superbobry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19992#discussion_r158154921
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/JsonProtocolSuite.scala
---
@@ -2022,12 +1947,7 @@ private[spark] object JsonProtocolSuite extends
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20023
@hvanhovell, as far as 1 is regarded, I was referring to [this
comment](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19449#pullrequestreview-67789784)
and [this
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19156#discussion_r158138431
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/stat/SummarizerSuite.scala ---
@@ -35,237 +34,252 @@ class SummarizerSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19940
**[Test build #85202 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85202/testReport)**
for PR 19940 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158119082
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -266,6 +266,21 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T <:
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158121081
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158117033
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -303,7 +299,7 @@ abstract class StreamExecution(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158137370
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousDataSourceRDDIter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158135301
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousDataSourceRDDIter.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+/*
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158122336
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158120930
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158120028
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19984#discussion_r158121770
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/continuous/ContinuousExecution.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19994
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85210/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19994
**[Test build #85210 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85210/testReport)**
for PR 19994 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19994
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20032#discussion_r158147697
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/k8s/KubernetesClusterSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -86,7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19993
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/85209/
Test PASSed.
---
401 - 500 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
