On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Robert Jenkins wrote:
> The GPL states that the source of any program distributed under the GPL must
> be freely available to 'all third parties' - Redhat cannot restrict it to
> their customers only, paying or otherwise.
>
> Extract from the GPL at http://www.gnu.org/licenses
e terms of
> this License.
>
>
> Regards,
> Robert Jenkins.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Magnus Hedemark
> Sent: 03 December 2003 16:08
> To: rhel-rebuild list
> Subject: Re: Re
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Magnus Hedemark
Sent: 03 December 2003 16:08
To: rhel-rebuild list
Subject: Re: Redhat response?
Stuart Low wrote:
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but shouldn't we be able to write a
> formal letter to Redhat requesting that the
Stuart Low wrote:
I was under the impression that since the software contained in the
SRPMS is GNU GPL covered (in most cases) Redhat would be required to
release the SRPMS anyway?
Only if they gave/sold you binaries covered under GNU GPL.
rhel-rebuild mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hosted at the
Stuart Low wrote:
Perhaps I'm missing something, but shouldn't we be able to write a
formal letter to Redhat requesting that their exact SRPM's posted for
their Enterprise editions be released? If they've been building the
system for distribution wouldn't that indicate that the SRPM's (or
perhaps
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Stuart Low wrote:
> > If you are a customer of theirs they MUST give you the src. If not it is
> > optional. The fact that they give non-customers anything is a bonus. One of
> > the things I want to do one of these days is look to see if the srpms on
> > rhn are different from
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:15, Stuart Low wrote:
> > If you are a customer of theirs they MUST give you the src. If not it is
> > optional. The fact that they give non-customers anything is a bonus. One of
> > the things I want to do one of these days is look to see if the srpms on
> > rhn are differ
> If you are a customer of theirs they MUST give you the src. If not it is
> optional. The fact that they give non-customers anything is a bonus. One of
> the things I want to do one of these days is look to see if the srpms on
> rhn are different from those on the web site. I just have not had the
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Stuart Low wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but shouldn't we be able to write a
> formal letter to Redhat requesting that their exact SRPM's posted for
> their Enterprise editions be released? If they've been building the
> system for distribution wouldn't
Hi there,
Perhaps I'm missing something, but shouldn't we be able to write a
formal letter to Redhat requesting that their exact SRPM's posted for
their Enterprise editions be released? If they've been building the
system for distribution wouldn't that indicate that the SRPM's (or
perhaps the buil
10 matches
Mail list logo
