Thanks for the info, Age. It sounds like you're about to have some
fun. :) Keep us posted.
Mark
twitter.com/pharkmillups
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Age Mooij wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I've been testing this on a customer project that is not in production yet so
> most of the tire-kicking so
Hi Shahzad,
That is indeed odd.
What version of Riak? And there's really nothing worthwhile in the logs? :)
Mark
twitter.com/pharkmillups
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Shahzad Bhatti
wrote:
> I am looking into Riak and running a single instance of server on Ubuntu
> server. I am adding simp
I would like to move the data folder to give it more room but I notice that
there is a 'ring' subfolder. Should I do anything with this 'ring' folder or
will it get reconstructed automatically. I currently have a cluster of 4
physical machines and I would rather not go through the steps of bringing
Hi, Ingo.
On Mar 19, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Ingo Rockel wrote:
> and the riak-users mailer-daemon should really set a "reply-to"…
Most email client programs have two well-understood controls for replies, one
for "reply (to sender)" and one for "reply to all."
We are not going to make one of them b
Also, in the mean time, adding +swt very_low to your vm.args can help
lessen the incidence of this issue.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Ingo Rockel
wrote:
> and the riak-users mailer-daemon should really set a "reply-to"...
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Betreff: Re: riak cluster s
and the riak-users mailer-daemon should really set a "reply-to"...
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: Re: riak cluster suddenly became unresponsive
Datum: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:40:12 +0100
Von: Ingo Rockel
An: Mark Phillips
Hi Mark,
thanks!
The 1.3 update is already planned.
But we
Hi Ingo,
Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
This looks symptomatic of some of the scheduler issues we fixed of 1.3. A
few of theeleveldb issues in the release notes [1] can provide precise
details. Is upgrading a possibility?
Tweaking your zdbbl in vm.args should alleviate some of t
