Hi Everyone
I'm new to Riak and was hoping someone might be able to give me some advice
with how well suited Riak is to large data sets queried in real time. My
potential use case is similar to the idea of storing the json for Twitter
tweets in one bucket and then the json for the author of the t
Hi Basho people,
I need to get some info about user Riak on VM's .
We intend to use Riak as the backed for a user session store . We have
tested on EC2 and determined the following :
Using a cluster of 5 x EC2's m1.xlarge instances. (4 cores, 15GB memory). w
/256 partitions w/ Bitcask :
At 100K
Hi Massimiliano,
As a first step I would recommend setting pb_backlog to 64 or 128 in your
app.config
How are you distributing the load from your python clients to the Riak
cluster? Is every python client connecting directly to one Riak node or do
you have a pool of Riak servers configured in eac
Hi Daniel,
target_n_val can be changed at any time and will take effect at the first
iteration of the claim algorithm [0] (which usually runs whenever you
add/remove nodes from the cluster via the riak-admin command)
On default settings, Riak is able to replicate data to distinct nodes in
all clu
An explicit RiakError with 'timeout' as the string usually indicates that
the server replied with that text in the response. You might need to check
that the node(s) you are connected to aren't overloaded or having other
issues. You can also make the timeout higher than the default 60sec by
passing
James,
In general, I think this is a reasonable approach (for some reasonable
value of "real time").
A couple of questions.
Do you mean to use a standalone Solr instance, or the Yokozuna project
(Solr integrated with Riak, in Riak 2.0)? (You can read about its usage
here: http://docs.basho.com/ri
Hi Toby,
This feature has been requested and is on our roadmap but right now there's
not a firm delivery date.
--
Luke Bakken
CSE
lbak...@basho.com
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote:
> Hi,
> I wondered if Basho is intending to add support for user POST uploads
> in Riak C
Hello all!
I have a 6 machine cluster with leveldb as backend, using riak 1.4.8
version.
Today, the ssd of one of the machine's has failed and is not recoverable,
so I have already ordered a new one that should arrive by thursday!
In the meanwhile what should I do? I have no backup of the old ss
Probably the easiest thing would be to wait until the new machine is
ready to join, add it with a nodename distinct from that of the last
one, and force-replace the new node for the old, dead one.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I have a 6 machine cluster with
Thanks Evan!
Is it really imperative that the name should be != than the old one?
Best regards
—
Sent from my iPhone
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Evan Vigil-McClanahan
wrote:
> Probably the easiest thing would be to wait until the new machine is
> ready to join, add it with a nodename
Hi,
I was trying to delete all of the keys generated with the following:
{key_generator, {int_to_bin, {uniform_int, 1000}}}.
I have used this for the deletion:
{key_generator, {int_to_bin, {partitioned_sequential_int, 1000}}}.
I has completed but unfortunately was not deleting any data
11 matches
Mail list logo