There is support for indexing CRDTs. Field definitions are defined in the
default schema:
https://github.com/basho/yokozuna/blob/develop/priv/default_schema.xml#L96
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Paul Walk wrote:
> Thanks Luke.
>
> If I might be allowed a follow-on question, what is the eff
Actually, a bucket type is not required. To associate an index with a
bucket you simply set the `search_index` property. Bucket types provide a
method for many buckets to inherit the same properties. Setting the
search_index property on the bucket type is a way to index multiple buckets
under one i
jsonpp, and the python app are just convenience tools to format the json output
in the pretty way. Just don't use it to see the raw output.
Eric
On Mar 24, 2014, at 10:23 AM, "Sapre, Meghna A"
wrote:
> I see my index in the bucket properties, but the search query still doesn’t
> have anythi
To date, only leveldb. Will be expanding the matrix to bitcask this week for
the first time. Not sure where memory backend fits with that particular test
scenario. Will ask around.
Matthew
On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:38 PM, István wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Just a quick question. Do you test Ria
Hi Matthew,
Just a quick question. Do you test Riak with memory backend with 130k
objects or just LevelDB?
Regards,
Istvan
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Matthew Von-Maszewski
wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> We regularly test Riak and its leveldb backend with 130k objects as part of
> our performance and
Thank you, this has been very helpful. I appreciate all of the information and
the quick responses.
- Jeff
On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:20 PM, Seth Thomas wrote:
> To further elaborate:
>
> When a nodes fails (or is simply too slow) for a PUT request, that data will
> be placed on the first fallba
To further elaborate:
When a nodes fails (or is simply too slow) for a PUT request, that data will be
placed on the first fallback in the preflist as per [1]. For a GET the request
only needs to full fill the R[2] value which for an N of 3, is 2. So the GET
request would succeed by simply takin
Aha, so if a node is detected to go down, but the cluster is not currently
receiving any requests (i.e. on a development cluster that is used to store
data that is only requested periodically or in batches, etc.) then there would
not be any increased I/O unless it is manually ("administratively
As immediately as the cluster can detect the node is no longer serving
requests[1]. There will likely be increased network and IO among the remaining
nodes as they will be picking up the slack. That said, the data is not
permanently reshuffled at that point - only such time as it is administrati
Ingo,
Maximum size involves more components of Riak than my specialty area of
leveldb. So I did some asking around the engineering room. The word back is:
- 1M is a typical, recommended maximum,
- if you care about worst case latencies (tail latencies), should stay below
100K
- if you really,
Does that happen immediately? I am basically trying to understand: When a
physical node goes down (let's say it is temporarily restarted, or down for
even a couple hours due to some sort of failure), will that cause an increase
in disk and network bandwidth at the moment that it goes down as dat
Data is redistributed temporarily (indefinitely) until the primary node comes
back online. So primary ownership of data would not be changed but your keys
could be living on another physical node if any of the primary replicas were
down.
So to answer your question directly: Yes (in the narrowes
Thank you. So, does that mean that no redistribution of data would occur unless
the node is manually removed?
- Jeff
On Mar 24, 2014, at 1:31 PM, Seth Thomas wrote:
> Jeff,
>
> When a node is no longer responding a process called hinted handoff[1] takes
> over and ensure that your N (replic
Jeff,
When a node is no longer responding a process called hinted handoff[1] takes
over and ensure that your N (replication) value is met by allowing other nodes
to temporarily take responsibility for the vnodes of the downed node. This node
can return to the cluster and will resume operations
I see my index in the bucket properties, but the search query still doesn't
have anything. The objects are in the bucket.
$ curl "$RIAK_HOST/search/famous?wt=json&q=name_s:lion*" | python -mjson.tool
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current
Hi Matthew,
thanks for the Infos. What is the maximum size of objects which I can
store into riak without the need of splitting them and without suffering
from performance issues?
Best,
Ingo
Am 24.03.2014 13:55, schrieb Matthew Von-Maszewski:
Ingo,
We regularly test Riak and its l
Thanks Luke.
If I might be allowed a follow-on question, what is the effect of adding an
index to a 'typed bucket-type'. For example, if I define a bucket_type as
follows:
./riak-admin bucket-type create map_bucket_type
'{"props":{"search_index":"my_index","datatype":"map"}}'
Are the members
Is there a description of what happens internally when a node goes down? I am
curious if any there would be any sort of reshuffling or redistribution of data
in the remaining vnodes? Or would the node simply be unavailable until
restarted?
Thanks,
Jeff
__
Hi Paul,
You are correct, a new bucket type must be created for Riak 2.0 search
indexes.
--
Luke Bakken
CSE
lbak...@basho.com
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Paul Walk wrote:
> I'm experimenting with the technology preview of Riak 2.0, using an
> existing Ruby web application which uses the
Ingo,
We regularly test Riak and its leveldb backend with 130k objects as part of our
performance and qualification tests. Works just fine.
The one thing to remember is that with N=3 redundancy, the bandwidth between
the nodes will approach 3 times the incoming user bandwidth. Make sure your
Hi List,
I'm currently evaluating the possibilities to migrate our mysql-based
image storage to something which actually scales and is easier to maintain.
Among different distributed file systems (like ceph, openstack swift) I
was looking at riak as we already have a riak cluster for storing
I'm experimenting with the technology preview of Riak 2.0, using an existing
Ruby web application which uses the official Ruby client gem (1.4.3).
My understanding is that if I have not specified particular bucket-types, then
my buckets are implicitly using a 'default' bucket type. So, in order
22 matches
Mail list logo
