Re: Broken beam for bitcask patch on basho website

Sorry for the trouble, yes, the file was indeed an HTML page rather than the actual file. That was completely my fault messing up a "Save Link" on Github not pointing to the actual raw file. The link: http://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.basho.com/patches/bitcask-2.0-merge-crash/riak_kv_bitcask_back

Re: Broken beam for bitcask patch on basho website

Sorry for the trouble, yes, the file was indeed an HTML page rather than the actual file. That was completely my fault messing up a "Save Link" on Github not pointing to the actual raw file. The link: http://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.basho.com/patches/bitcask-2.0-merge-crash/riak_kv_bitcask_back

Re: Packagecloud.io

Alex, If you want to use apt to install Riak, then packagecloud.io is what you need to do since we are not updating our [apt|yum].basho.com repos moving forward. We need to update our documentation, so I'll get on that right away. Right now an upgrade is available for Riak (2.0.0 rather than rc1

[ANN] Riak 2.0.0

Riak Users, We are overjoyed to announce the final release of Riak 2.0.0. The documentation page has been completely redone and updated for 2.0, so please see that for the most complete information on 2.0. A full listing of the new features in 2.0, along with

Re: Is it a good practice to make riak a service and automatically start when the machine starts?

Gavin, I think if you monitor the crash and reboot and take note or flag if it happens often, then that could be when you investigate the node more in depth. Having a node go up and down often is a sign clearly of something bad happening that should be investigated. For a rare reboot/crash, havi

Re: Riak 2.0.0 RC1

New to RIAK, Does Riak 2.0 support Play 2.0. Is there a java/scala > driver? > > - Shailesh > > From: Alex De la rosa > Date: Monday, July 21, 2014 at 2:38 PM > To: Jared Morrow > Cc: Riak Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Riak 2.0.0 RC1 > > Awesome! C

Re: Riak 2.0.0 RC1

wait to try it! What about the python client for Riak 2.0? > I remember testing the actual version and still have many issues and > non-workable new features (like counters, sets, maps, etc.) > > Thanks! > Alex > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Jared Morrow wrote: >

Riak 2.0.0 RC1

Riak-Users, Everyone at Basho is extremely happy to announce the public availability of Riak 2.0.0 RC. As a release candidate, we do not recommend using it in production, but it should be considered feature and API complete for Riak 2.0 final. We reserve the right to make changes for any data-loss

Re: Tag 2.0.0rc1 ??

:40, Jared Morrow > wrote: > >> I'd personally be very disappointed if something wasn't in your hands by >> the end of this week. >> > > No word? :( > > ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho

Re: Tag 2.0.0rc1 ??

Dave, Yes, I tagged RC1 on Friday. The plan for us is to do some finishing work on docs, some last rounds of tests to be done, and then put it out to the public sometime soon. I've learned to not give firm dates at this point, but I'd personally be very disappointed if something wasn't in your h

Re: Riak for streaming video

9, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Alex De la rosa wrote: > Hi there, > > One more question regarding Riak CS, does it behave like standard Riak? > storing 3 copies (default) and needing a minimum of 5 servers to operate? > > Cheers, > Alex > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 2:4

Re: Riak for streaming video

Luwak is definitely EOL'd and RiakCS is our large object store going forward. It is a far superior design compared to Luwak and handles very large file sizes. On Thursday, June 26, 2014, Jason Campbell wrote: > Riak CS is designed to be the same interface as Amazon S3. It can be run > anywhe

Re: [ANN] Riak 2.0.0beta1

This is now fixed, sorry for the trouble. -Jared On Wednesday, April 16, 2014, Jared Morrow wrote: > That's my fault, I had a script timeout on that package upload and I > didn't notice it. Sorry, it will be fixed shortly. > > -Jared > > > On Wed, Apr 16,

Re: [ANN] Riak 2.0.0beta1

That's my fault, I had a script timeout on that package upload and I didn't notice it. Sorry, it will be fixed shortly. -Jared On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Andrew Zeneski wrote: > No more OS X builds? > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Tom Santero wrote: > >> Hello Riak Users, >> >>

PSA: Building Riak 2.0.x from source

Riak Users, There have been several issues people have ran into with Riak 2.0 pre's and beta tags due to incompatibilities in different versions of Erlang. For 2.0 we are building against R16B02, with our own patches put on top of it. We are planning on documenting this on the docs page, but tha

Re: Error Starting Up Development Cluster using 2.0pre12 on Ubuntu 12.04

For future reference, we found the bug and have a fix in for it https://github.com/basho/cuttlefish/pull/114 We are still planning suggesting R16 and all packages will be against R16B02, but that PR fixes R15 support in case anyone needs it. Sorry for the trouble, Jared On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at

Re: Error Starting Up Development Cluster using 2.0pre12 on Ubuntu 12.04

Andrew, So we just ran into this as well when using Erlang R15. We are investigating. If you use Erlang R16B02 you should not see this error. For what its worth, Riak 2.0 will be built against R16. Sorry for the troubles, Jared On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Andrew Hamilton wrote: > When

Re: Performance Tuning in OmniOS

hopeless. > > Thank you. > On Jan 21, 2014 11:17 PM, "Jared Morrow" wrote: > >> What type of RAID did you chose for your spool of 5 volumes? If you >> chose the default of raidz, you will not be getting much of a performance >> boost over vanilla EBS

Re: Performance Tuning in OmniOS

What type of RAID did you chose for your spool of 5 volumes? If you chose the default of raidz, you will not be getting much of a performance boost over vanilla EBS, just a big integrity boost. Also, unless you are using provisioned IOPS for EBS, you are starting from an extremely slow base-case,

Re: Update: [ANN] Riak 2.0pre11

Riak-Users, Looking at the test logs, this appears to be related to some new configuration files and does not affect our OSS users. Please still report any unusual things you see. Sorry for the hot/cold emails, we'd rather be extra conservative, so when we started seeing failures in tests, we ar

Re: Which OS Version i have to use

ikely. -Jared On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Vahric Muhtaryan wrote: > thanks you > Riak 2.0 is closer ? > > On Friday, December 6, 2013, Jared Morrow wrote: > > Vahric, > > Riak 1.4 was built against CentOS 6.4. I imagine it will work fine on > 6.5 as there aren'

Re: Which OS Version i have to use

Vahric, Riak 1.4 was built against CentOS 6.4. I imagine it will work fine on 6.5 as there aren't a lot of external dependencies that Riak has outside of its package. Riak 2.0 when it is released will be built on CentOS 6.5 now that 6.5 is released. -Jared On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Vah

Re: Riak 2.0 release schedule?

Monday. Just kidding. Let me state right up front that we tend to not promise any dates. We release Riak versions when we believe they are done, tested every way we know how, and generally are the highest quality. Something like 2.0 is even worse because there are so many new major features.

Re: Riak Recap for September 26 - October 25

I don't recommend trying to watch both streams at the same time. I tried last year and ended missing them both. On Friday, October 25, 2013, Tom Santero wrote: > Hey Dave, > > You'll wanna keep an eye on http://ricon.io/live.html > > Live stream of both track rooms, autoscaling multi bitrate,

Re: Updating Counters on Riak 2.0 pre whatever

Darren, Yes we do, we are actively testing our pre builds as we speak. This code was early pre-release and was stated as such. It is also on the 'develop' branch which we advertise as development code and not necessarily fully integration tested. Thanks for your concern. -Jared On Tue, Oct 22

Re: 1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no longer works?

a very simple fix. > > What concerns me is that the 'cluster' commands do not have an analogous > feature: 'replace' does not do the same thing as 'reip'. > > Is it truly a foregone conclusion that 'reip' is going away? > > -- > Dave Brad

Re: 1.4.2: 'riak-admin reip' no longer works?

This was a mistake on my part, if you s/up/down/ (node_down_check) on that line it will correctly ensure the node is down before running reip. Sorry about that, clearly 'reip' is not heavily used with the new cluster commands and it slipped under the radar for all these months. -Jared On Mon, O

Re: vm.swappiness ?

It is checked by 'riak-admin diag' if you run that to check your system. -Jared On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Alex Rice wrote: > Thanks for confirming, Matthew! That might be a good check for the > startup script, much like I think it currently complains about ulimit > is not set to the M

Re: Build-in Erlang shell.

2013 at 11:26 AM, Victor wrote: > Thanks for response. I don’t have any particular plans on using this > console, and just trying to discover what options to do what is available > for troubleshooting, maintenance and operation of a cluster other then a > client operations. **

Re: Build-in Erlang shell.

A friendly coworker pointed out I made a mistake in my reply, I was thinking of connecting to remote nodes not local nodes. You don't need to do RPC calls with `riak attach`. Sorry about that. On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Jared Morrow wrote: > The erlang shell found with riak att

Re: Build-in Erlang shell.

The erlang shell found with riak attach is a remote shell. You can make RPC calls into the Riak node from there. If you look at nodetool found in your install it can give you examples on how to use Erlang’s RPC call mechanism. We don’t typically recommend people do that as a regular practice though

Re: User Space Install of Riak on Suse EL 11 SP2?

And yes you will need an erlang with OpenSSL. Like Pedram suggested, just statically link in SSL with the flags found in ./configure --help On Friday, October 11, 2013, Pedram Nimreezi wrote: > You should be able to install openssl to your home directory as well, then > use the erlang configur

Re: Riak on Mac OSX 10.7.5

e[3]: Nothing to be done for `opt'. > >> >> === Leaving application jinterface > >> >> === Entering application ic > >> >> make[3]: Nothing to be done for `opt'. > >> >> make -f i386-apple-darwin11.4.2/Makefile TYPE=opt > >> >> gcc -

Re: Riak on Mac OSX 10.7.5

As Steve said, this package is for 10.8+. If you would like to build from source, you can follow the instructions here: http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/building/installing/from-source/ If you would like to build a package to use on other machines, follow the same instructions, except call

Re: Riak on SAN

Chiming in with the completely anecdotal statement that we have customers who run large Riak clusters on ZFS. As far as I know, we haven't gotten any complaints due to ZFS. The only cautionary tale would be to not let your zpool completely fill up because deletes take up storage due to the append

Re: benchmark results on my $75/month 5 node cluster :)

Thanks for sharing. Information on benchmarks is very useful because we often get questions about "ballpark benchmarks for X hardware" on the mailing list. I'm glad you are getting good performance on a relatively inexpensive cluster. -Jared On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Alex Rice wrote: >

Re: 2i at large scale?

Benchmarking a database designed for multiple nodes on a single node usually doesn't give you any measurements that are useful. We recommend 5 nodes minimum for clusters, so if you can do that, it is best to benchmark on a realistic cluster. If you are determined to benchmark on a single node, yo

Re: Very high CPU usage by bean.smp

> > Interesting. Someone knows what this entropy thing is doing exactly? Can > it be switched off by default maybe? > Here is a description of AAE when it was released in Riak 1.3 http://basho.com/introducing-riak-1-3/ You can turn off AAE in your config files if you want it off. With Riak (and

Re: riak-cs_1.4.1-1 Debian package

Sebastian, There is no newer package. Can you tell me the following: * What debian version are you on? * What user did you run the above command on? Do they have root access? >From that same user can you do this: mkdir -p /etc/riak-cs && touch /etc/riak-cs/testfile && echo "success" * If you

Re: error starting risk 1.4.2 from prebuilt distro for MacOS

r -zxf riak-1.4.2-OSX-x86_64.tar.gz >> rs:Development romanshestakov$ cd riak-1.4.2 >> rs:riak-1.4.2 romanshestakov$ ./bin/riak chkconfig >> Error reading >> /Users/romanshestakov/Development/riak-1.4.2/bin/../etc/app.config >> >> I am on MacOs 10.7.5 >> >&g

Re: error starting risk 1.4.2 from prebuilt distro for MacOS

**EDIT** Resending w/o thread to pass through size limit restriction. Pardon possible duplicate emails Yes indeed, these packages are built on 10.8 and possibly won't work with 10.7. You can build your own package for 10.7 easily like: * clone riak * git checkout riak-1.4.2 * make package * pa

Re: error starting risk 1.4.2 from prebuilt distro for MacOS

Roman, I have no problems with it: ➜ /tmp wget http://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.basho.com/riak/1.4/1.4.2/osx/10.8/riak-1.4.2-OSX-x86_64.tar.gz 12:12 --2013-09-17 12:12:10-- http://s3.amazonaws.com/downloads.basho.com/riak/1.4/1.4.2/osx/10.8/riak-1.4.2-OSX-x86_64.tar.gz Resolving s3.

Re: [ANN] Riak 1.4.2

Seth is working on that now, should be sometime today. -Jared On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Jonathan Rudenberg wrote: > On Aug 30, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Jared Morrow wrote: > > > We are pleased to announce the availability of Riak 1.4.2. > > Awesome, when will it show

Re: my performance numbers are low

Riak is not meant to be on a single server. With the default settings, you are writing three copies of every key to disk instead of one. Comparing Riak to Couch on a single server is like comparing apples to oranges. Here is a better comparison of Riak v. Couch http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/

Re: post installation

. I see only packages for 12.04 and > they are marked as AMD64. I also tried installing using apt-get but when I > added basho repo to my sources and did apt-get update I got some 403 errors > like this guy: > http://askubuntu.com/questions/265347/how-to-install-riak-on-ubuntu-12-10 >

[ANN] Riak 1.4.2

Riak Users, We are pleased to announce the availability of Riak 1.4.2. This is a bugfix release based on the 1.4.x series of Riak. The major subsystems with fixes are: - Fixed various problems related to crashing stats - Fixed extra noisy logs introduced in 1.4.1 (Not found errors and

Re: post installation

A built release from source uses relative paths in the scripts to locate the various erlang start scripts it needs to run. If you are building from a rel instead of using the packages, the best thing to do is to move the entire 'rel/riak' directory somewhere as a unit. So you can move 'rel/riak'

Re: Practical Riak cluster choices in AWS (number of nodes? AZ's?)

+1 to what Jeremiah said, putting a 4 or 5 node cluster in each US West and US East using MDC between them would be the optimum solution. I'm also not buying consistent latencies between AZ's, but I've also not tested it personally in a production environment. We have many riak-users members on A

Re: Riak 1.3.1 Errors

Shane, This bug was fixed in Riak 1.4.x in this commit https://github.com/basho/riak_pipe/pull/73 which was backported to 1.3.2 with this https://github.com/basho/riak_pipe/pull/74. I'm not an expert on the issue itself, so I'll have to ask if those messages are something that are safe to ignore.

Re: performance

Also, are you generating the load from the same VMs that Riak is running on or do you have separate machines generating load? On Thursday, August 1, 2013, Jeremy Ong wrote: > What erlang version did you build with? How are you load balancing > between the nodes? What kind of disks are you using

Re: riak 1.4.0 upgrade failed

So 'epmd' (erlang port mapper daemon) is probably still running under the riak user. You can try killing epmd and making sure no other process is running under the riak user. I'll put in an issue to not fail so hard if the usermod command fails. Sorry for the troubles. -Jared On Fri, Jul 19,

Re: riak_kv_memory_backend in production

data he is requiring to store is only "transient", would it >> make sense to set N=2 for performance? Or will N=2 have the opposite effect >> due to amount of nodes having such replica? >> >> Guido. >> >> On 18/07/13 16:15, Jared Morrow wrote: >> >

Re: riak_kv_memory_backend in production

Kumar, We have a few customers who use the memory backend. The first example I could find (with the help of our CSE team) uses the memory backend on 8 machines with 12gb of ram each. I know you are just testing right now, but we'd suggest using 5 node minimum. With N=3 on a 3-node cluster you c

Re: +zdbbl recommended value

Guido, So higher +zdbbl numbers will allow for larger message buffers, but at the expense of memory usage. We've actually added better wording in the default vm.args file for 1.4+ https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/master/rel/files/vm.args#L40 So I guess the best answer is trial & error. We add

Re: riak-admin diag output

Daniel, The reason we recommend a 5 node cluster is the problem you are seeing. With N=3 on a 3-node cluster you have no guarantees that your data will be evenly spread around your cluster. We talk about this in the documentation

Re: Can't start Riak. Erlang crashes immediately. Memory problem?

Sometimes things aren't started up in time when you use 'riak-admin test' right after 'riak start'. I've seen that happen before. Try starting riak, waiting a minute or so and doing riak-admin test again and see if it starts writing. -Jared On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:54 AM, prog112 wrote: > S

Re: Trouble with some Apt repositories

This should now be fixed, sorry for any troubles it might have caused. -Jared On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jared Morrow wrote: > Riak Users, > > Yesterday we had to rebuild 1.4.0 packages and at the same time had to > refresh the Apt/Yum repositories with those new packages.

Trouble with some Apt repositories

Riak Users, Yesterday we had to rebuild 1.4.0 packages and at the same time had to refresh the Apt/Yum repositories with those new packages. Something in this process must have broken down. We have had someone report a problem with the Ubuntu precise repo filed here: https://github.com/basho/ria

[ANNC] Riak 1.4.0

Riak Users, As was somewhat hinted at by the apt/yum repo update, we are happy to announce the release of Riak 1.4.0. A blog post giving a high level overview of the release can be found here: http://basho.com/basho-announces-availability-of-riak-1-4/ Does that mention counters? I believe it do

Re: Upgrade path 1.4.0

We try to post the packages to all the right places before we make the announcement so I'd highly recommend you don't just auto-update Riak packages when they hit apt/yum. I'm glad you eventually got all your nodes upgraded. -Jared On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Toby Corkindale < toby.corkin

[ANNC] Riak 1.4.0 RC1

Riak Users, We are pleased to announce the availability of Riak 1.4.0 Release Candidate 1. As with other major releases we provide these RC builds so you can test out new functionality and give us feedback before the final build ships. The download can be found on the docs page: http://docs.bash

Riak 1.3.2 RPM patch release

Riak Users, One of my fellow coworkers found an issue in the Riak 1.3.2 RPM's. There is a typo in the init script that causes `service riak status` to fail. This will cause those of you who use Chef, Puppet, Ansible some pain because they expect status to work properly (as they should). The iss

Re: [ANNC] Riak 1.3.2

gt; really love to see that this issue get's closed. > > If you just missed in the release notes, ignore what I wrote :) > > > Best > > Sebastian > > On 21.06.2013, at 23:27, Jared Morrow 'cvml', 'ja...@basho.com');>> wrote: > > Riak U

[ANNC] Riak 1.3.2

Riak Users, We are pleased to announce the release of a performance and bugfix release on the Riak 1.3 series. To those astute readers and Github repo watchers, we do still intend to release Riak 1.4.0 soon, but 1.3.2 are for those folks who want to stay on the 1.3.x family. Please take the time

Re: Riak does not work on ec2

David, Riak does indeed work on EC2, we have many customers who deploy exclusively to EC2. We also happened to do some large cluster testing on ec2 this week so I know nothing has suddenly gone awry. Your problem seems to be you using your external IP rather than your internal IP in your configu

Re: On Ubuntu 13.04 / 64

Mono, 1.3 had some issues around return codes and 'service' might be getting upset. Using just 'sudo riak start' and 'sudo riak stop' is the preferred method. You do not need to create /var/lib/riak, the proper data directories will be created on the first start. I'd highly recommend you follow

Re: On Ubuntu 13.04 / 64

Wheezy didn't exist when 1.3.1 came out, hence the lack of that option on apt.basho.com. -Jared On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Dave Thomas wrote: > I saw a similar problem with Debian Wheezy a few weeks ago. Also solved > by pointing my host to the Squeeze directories on apt.basho.com. >

Re: On Ubuntu 13.04 / 64

Mono, First, welcome to Riak and the riak community. In regards to erlang, the Riak package will give you all the erlang bits you need, you shouldn't install erlang from the Ubuntu repos. Python is one of the client libraries we provide and support. I'm not an expert on it, but we do actively s

Re: On Ubuntu 13.04 / 64

Mono, Installing the Ubuntu 12.04 package with 'dpkg -i' will work fine. -Jared On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:10 AM, mdr wrote: > Hello - > > Trying to install on Ubuntu 13.04/64. > ... > The apt-get listed here did not work: > > http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/tutorials/installation/Installing

Re: Slow write performance for Riak CS

> On 28/05/13 01:41, Jared Morrow wrote: > >> Toby, >> >> If you write with multiple clients does it still stick to 9mb/s or >> does it increase? What is the network link between your client and >> the Riak CS cluster? On our internal CS cluster we were seeing

Re: Slow write performance for Riak CS

Toby, If you write with multiple clients does it still stick to 9mb/s or does it increase? What is the network link between your client and the Riak CS cluster? On our internal CS cluster we were seeing around 2gb/s read+write at the network level so I know CS can take the speeds, so my gut t

Re: Riak 1.3.1 Warning start up message. Install from source.

FWIW, we forked the bear repo for another change and I removed the `native` flag as well. Riak 1.4 should no longer have these warnings. -Jared On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:50 AM, ageemoore wrote: > Yup yup. Understood. Thanks for the explanation. > > > > -- > View this message in context: >

Re: Riak init script hangs on "stop"

Pascal, We've seen similar behavior in testing and have always failed to track down the cause. Nothing is actually running in Riak, but the process still just hangs around. I filed an issue for this https://github.com/basho/riak/issues/330. Coincidentally on the erlang-bugs mailing list someone

Re: Riak 1.3.1 Warning start up message. Install from source.

We don't control the bear repository so as long as they are trying to compile native code that warning will stick around. Sorry for the log spam. -Jared On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:20 AM, ageemoore wrote: > OK. I also see this with my 1.2.1 version which I'm currently using in > production, bu

Re: Riak 1.3.1 Warning start up message. Install from source.

This is nothing to worry about. The low-level details revolve around HiPE http://www.it.uu.se/research/group/hipe/. Bear uses a compile flag to use HiPE for native code loading. We ship an Erlang with HiPE disabled for reasons that caused instability on several platforms. This clash of Bear try

Re: Receiving ulimit warning despite setting it

formed decision. Is > > the default ulimit in most distros too low? Absolutely but it's in the > > domain of the OS/Distro provider and not a third-party package to tweak > > possible dangerous knobs. > > > > The only sane default here is to use what the distro sets

Re: Receiving ulimit warning despite setting it

e for our next major release to get in, but I do indeed want to make this easier on everyone, so thanks for the feedback. -Jared On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Toby Corkindale < toby.corkind...@strategicdata.com.au> wrote: > On 16/05/13 15:38, Jared Morrow wrote: > >> I&#

Re: Receiving ulimit warning despite setting it

that the documentation should be updated. We do take PRs ;) -Jared On May 15, 2013, at 10:54 PM, Toby Corkindale wrote: > On 16/05/13 14:39, Toby Corkindale wrote: >> On 16/05/13 14:24, Jared Morrow wrote: >>> Well the riak-cs / riak / stanchion scripts all drop privileges u

Re: Receiving ulimit warning despite setting it

Well the riak-cs / riak / stanchion scripts all drop privileges using sudo. On RHEL/Centos this sudo exec carries the settings from the calling user (in the case of init.d, root) so things are fine there. On Ubuntu/Debian that does not always work. So if you set the ulimit for the root user, it

Re: Installation of Riak on Fedora

Christopher, We don't maintain those package that come from Fedora and don't test against those packages. We test against our own packages that are integrated with the Erlang VM we embed with Riak. This ensures as best as we can a high level of testing that is consistent on all platforms. By all m

Re: ubuntu package ERTS version issue

This is a known issue that will be fixed in any new packages, it has been reported here https://github.com/basho/riak/issues/306 I will also make a note to fix the README in the morning, sorry about the confusion. We do have a lot of repos, so the safe bet is to file it against github.com/basho/r

Re: Riak 1.3.1 install from source on closed network

c to dev% : riaknostic Remove the 'dev' directory to make sure everything is clean and try to run 'make devrel' again. Let me know how that goes. Sorry for the troubles, Jared On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:25 AM, HARLOW Peter wrote: > *From:* Jared Morrow [mailto:ja...@basho.com]

Re: Riak 1.3.1 install from source on closed network

Peter, For 1.3.0 & 1.3.1 of Riak, you use the "1.3.0" version of leveldb. -Jared On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:36 AM, HARLOW Peter wrote: > When installing Riak 1.3.1 from source on a closed network, which > version of leveldb zipball should one use? > > ** ** > > Regards, > > ** ** > > P

Re: A story about unexpected changes in riak-erlang-client dependencies

In regards to 3rd parties, we've generally had good luck asking the developer to make a tag for us or to merge a branch that has fixed dependencies. I do agree it is a problem, but it is one that can be fixed. Sorry you ran into problems in any of our repos, we are working to fix our process a bi

[ANNC] Riak CS 1.3.1

Riak Users, To keep everyone on their toes with our Riak 1.3.1 release yesterday, today we have an update to Riak CS in the form of 1.3.1. Riak CS and Stanchion have both been updated. There is no update to Riak CS Control at this time. The downloads can be found on our docs page: http://docs.b

Re: Do nodes always need to restart after backend selection?

Toby, That particular page is talking about changing the default settings of the backend of a bucket. In that specific case, if you want to change the default behavior in your app.config file a restart is necessary. One particularly important detail there is you don't need to restart *all* nodes

Re: [ANNC] Riak 1.3.1

hanks, Jared On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jared Morrow wrote: > Riak Users, > > We are happy to announce that Riak 1.3.1 is ready for your to download and > install. It continues on the 1.3.x family with some nice bugfixes. See > the release notes linked below for all the details. &

[ANNC] Riak 1.3.1

Riak Users, We are happy to announce that Riak 1.3.1 is ready for your to download and install. It continues on the 1.3.x family with some nice bugfixes. See the release notes linked below for all the details. Release notes can be found here: https://github.com/basho/riak/blob/1.3/RELEASE-NOTES

Re: Riak CS : "405 (Method Not Allowed)" when creating a bucket

Jean-Baptiste, Bucket creation is one of the operations handled by 'stanchion'. So, make sure you've install stanchion installed on only one node and that all riak-cs nodes are pointing at that one stanchion node. If that all looks fine, the second thing to check is that the admin credentials ma

Re: fail install apt-get on i386

Yes, this is true. If you would like to make your own package for 32bit, you can build from source and do a 'make package', but we highly recommend you consider moving off of a 32bit platform to a 64bit one. In the future we will most likely drop 32bit packages entirely. -Jared On Thu, Mar 21,

Re: [ANN] Riak CS Is Now Open Source!

Formula and replacing > references to riak with riak-cs. Same directory structure and everything, > just different download paths and shasum signatures. > > > Thanks! > > Jon Brisbin > http://about.me/jbrisbin > > On Mar 20, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Jared Morrow wrote: > &g

Re: [ANN] Riak CS Is Now Open Source!

Jon, I haven't heard of anyone working on it. I don't know if you build homebrew packages from source or from our binary packages, but if so I goofed up in one of my release scripts and the 64bit osx packages didn't get uploaded. They are uploaded now and the site will get a refresh pretty soon.

Re: leveldb and noatime?

The topic of setting 'noatime' on your root partition has been answered in several places. The best bet is to just search google for your distribution of choice for the topic. Here's a good starting point, there are several tutorials in the list: http://goo.gl/C6A3V -Jared On Mon, Mar 18, 2013

Re: Understanding read_repairs

sba/5057828 > > > On 22.02.2013, at 19:56, Jared Morrow wrote: > > compile riak_kv with just 'make' > > > ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Re: Understanding read_repairs

vior we saw. Thanks you guys > for the help. > > -- > *From:* Jared Morrow [ja...@basho.com] > *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2013 11:56 AM > *To:* Belai Beshah > *Cc:* Russell Brown; riak-users@lists.basho.com > *Subject:* Re: Understanding read_repairs > > Belai, >

Re: Installing Riak on Ubuntu server.

Kevin, There might have been a momentary blip, but 'curl -O http://apt.basho.com/gpg/basho.apt.key' fetches the file fine for me now, so give it a try. -Jared On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Kevin Burton wrote: > I was looking at: > > ** ** > > And I started the first step > > curl

Re: Installing Riak on Ubuntu server.

Some maintenance was happening tonight on the servers hosting the yum and apt repositories. If possible try again in the morning, sorry for any inconvenience. -Jared On Feb 26, 2013, at 6:08 PM, "Kevin Burton" wrote: > I was looking at: > > And I started the first step > curl http://apt

32bit package status going forward

Riak Users, I would like to throw out a discussion topic for you all to consider. We have discussed internally about dropping 32bit packages from our releases. We haven't done so in the past because we thought there were still some good reasons to support it. Increasingly though, reasons are ru

Re: Understanding read_repairs

Belai, One other option is to use our "basho-patches" functionality. We use it to run new code on current installations where sending a new .beam file is easier than remaking the packages or compiling from source. On your ubuntu system using our packages, the folder should be in /usr/lib/riak/lib/

Re: [ANN] Riak 1.3 Released

is only in the script. If you're using > "riak attach" it cries about the low ulimit but that's not true for the > riak process itself. So a little bit confusing but no real error. > > Cheers, > Simon > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:09:40 -0700 > Jared Morrow

  1   2   3   >