Basho people will know if this is normal or not, but keep in mind that in
this way you are storing three copies of the data in the same machine,
where you have all the default 64 vnodes of your ring.
I think riak is designed for a cluster setup.
Are you planning to run the same benchmark with
an ideal use-case for riak. Eventual
consistency means that existence checking under partition is always
going to be a bit fraught.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Vincenzo Vitale
vincenzo.vit...@gmail.com wrote:
Suppose I want to just store keys in a bucket without any body, this make
sense
an empty body in Riak.
Surely just don't even make the request to Riak? I guess I could be
overlooking something obvious.
Sam
--
Sam Elliott
Engineer
sam.elli...@basho.com
--
On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 6:29PM, Vincenzo Vitale wrote:
Hi Sam,
thanks for the fast reply.
In my
Suppose I want to just store keys in a bucket without any body, this make
sense in scenarios where the key completely identify the entity. Is it
possible to use the riak http api without including the content-type header?
Looking at the http specifications, content–type is not mandatory or
app, but it is used by
riak and riak clients, so that's why we require it.
--
Sam Elliott
Engineer
sam.elli...@basho.com
--
On Tuesday, 10 September 2013 at 5:03PM, Vincenzo Vitale wrote:
Suppose I want to just store keys in a bucket without any body, this
make sense in scenarios where
Hi,
I'm trying to make SpatialSearch in my application working with Yokozuna.
(develop branch, hash 601560bf9ea0859e598957c13733fbbb0e656e17 of the 6th
september)
The json object looks like this:
