After asking around a bit, I think we’re likely to remove that recommendation
from the documentation.
Tuning is always a bit of a dark art, so as always your mileage may vary, but
there doesn’t seem to be any real advantage to lowering the thread count.
Thanks for raising the issue.
-John
Thanks for replying :)
Best regards!
On 11 February 2014 23:28, John Daily jda...@basho.com wrote:
After asking around a bit, I think we're likely to remove that
recommendation from the documentation.
Tuning is always a bit of a dark art, so as always your mileage may vary,
but there
Hi all,
I have a 6 machines cluster with a ring of 256 nodes with levelDB as
backend.
I've seen that recently in the documentation, this has appeared:
If using LevelDB as the storage backend (which maintains its own I/O thread
pool), the number of async threads in Riak's default pool can be
