Replies inline.
(Thanks to Russell for the link to my blog series, but honestly, as I now
re-read the section on conflict resolution, I’m unhappy with it. It’s a very
confusing topic and I regret not doing a better job of clarifying it. This
answer will undoubtedly also be more confusing than I
sage -
> From: "Edgar Veiga"
> To: "Eric Redmond"
> Cc: "Jason Campbell" , "riak-users" <
> riak-users@lists.basho.com>, "Russell Brown"
> Sent: Friday, 31 January, 2014 9:54:33 AM
> Subject: Re: last_write_win
on
has to take advantage of the extra consistency and reliability for it to make
sense.
Sorry again,
Jason Campbell
- Original Message -
From: "Edgar Veiga"
To: "Eric Redmond"
Cc: "Jason Campbell" , "riak-users"
, "Russell Brown"
Sent:
person on this list to see Riak being used for
>>> all sorts of uses, but I believe in the right tool for the right job.
>>> Unless there is something I don't understand, Riak is probably the wrong
>>> tool. It will work, but there is other software that will wor
nless there is something I don't understand, Riak is probably the wrong
>> tool. It will work, but there is other software that will work much better.
>>
>> I hope this helps,
>> Jason Campbell
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Edgar V
> I'm as happy as the next person on this list to see Riak being used for all
>> sorts of uses, but I believe in the right tool for the right job. Unless
>> there is something I don't understand, Riak is probably the wrong tool. It
>> will work, but there is ot
used for
> all sorts of uses, but I believe in the right tool for the right job.
> Unless there is something I don't understand, Riak is probably the wrong
> tool. It will work, but there is other software that will work much better.
>
> I hope this helps,
> Jason Campbell
riginal Message -
> From: "Edgar Veiga"
> To: "Russell Brown"
> Cc: "riak-users"
> Sent: Friday, 31 January, 2014 3:20:42 AM
> Subject: Re: last_write_wins
>
>
>
> I'll try to explain this the best I can, although it's a sim
. It will
work, but there is other software that will work much better.
I hope this helps,
Jason Campbell
- Original Message -
From: "Edgar Veiga"
To: "Russell Brown"
Cc: "riak-users"
Sent: Friday, 31 January, 2014 3:20:42 AM
Subject: Re: last_write_wins
I'll try to explain this the best I can, although it's a simples
architecture I'm not describing it in my native language :)
I have a set of node.js workers (64 for now) that serve as a
cache/middleware layer for a dozen of php applications. Each worker deals
with a set of documents (it's not a di
Hi Russell,
Thanks for your response, I understand most of it, I know LWW=true and
allow_multi=true won't make any sense, but look at this scenario:
All of our buckets have allow_multi=false except for the one bucket we
have for CRDT counters, our application requires certain some level of
c
On 30 Jan 2014, at 10:58, Guido Medina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now I'm curious too, according to
> http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/configs/configuration-files/
> the default value for Erlang property last_write_wins is false, now, if 95%
> of the buckets/keys have no siblings (or con
Hi,
Now I'm curious too, according to
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/configs/configuration-files/
the default value for Erlang property last_write_wins is false, now, if
95% of the buckets/keys have no siblings (or conflict resolution), does
that mean that for such buckets las
On 30 Jan 2014, at 10:37, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> Also,
>
> Using last_write_wins = true, do I need to always send the vclock while on a
> PUT request? In the official documention it says that riak will look only at
> the timestamp of the requests.
Ok, from what you’ve said it sounds like you a
Also,
Using last_write_wins = true, do I need to always send the vclock while on
a PUT request? In the official documention it says that riak will look only
at the timestamp of the requests.
Best regards,
On 29 January 2014 10:29, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> Hi Russel,
>
> No, it doesn't depend. It'
Hi Russel,
No, it doesn't depend. It's always a new value.
Best regards
On 29 January 2014 10:10, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> On 29 Jan 2014, at 09:57, Edgar Veiga wrote:
>
> tl;dr
>
> If I guarantee that the same key is only written with a 5 second interval,
> is last_write_wins=true profitabl
On 29 Jan 2014, at 09:57, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> tl;dr
>
> If I guarantee that the same key is only written with a 5 second interval, is
> last_write_wins=true profitable?
It depends. Does the value you write depend in anyway on the value you read, or
is it always that you are just getting a t
tl;dr
If I guarantee that the same key is only written with a 5 second interval,
is last_write_wins=true profitable?
On 27 January 2014 23:25, Edgar Veiga wrote:
> Hi there everyone!
>
> I would like to know, if my current application is a good use case to set
> last_write_wins to true.
>
> Ba
18 matches
Mail list logo
