Réf. : RE: Question on temperature factors

Dear Maria, I agree with Dr. Retief, I would never refine structure details like atomic coordinates or temperature factor (displacement factors) for QPA! Regards Francois Girod

Esther Schilder/ASD/Albemarle is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 01-07-2005 and will not return until 13-07-2005.

RE: DBWS vs other refinement programs

http://danse.cacr.caltech.edu/polls/results.php?sid=22 This Caltech survey is a bit strange. The Caltech experts range indexing programs in the category 'structure solution', mixed

Re: DBWS vs other refinement programs

http://danse.cacr.caltech.edu/polls/results.php?sid=22 Of course, the number of people using Rietveld software is more than 269 (number of answers in the survey) The number of respondents to the survey is ~150, but Rietveld users (at least the ones who took the time to participate) on average u

RE: DBWS vs other refinement programs

> A lot of Rietveld programs are DBW children... More precisely Armel, a lot of Rietveld programs are children of the original Rietveld code via Harwell :-) If you actually look into the DBW code, you will seen that. Even Bob, who was at Oxford at the time, had the original code to start with, tho

RE: DBWS vs other refinement programs

Are you applying ? No such ambition. Armel

Caltech survey

Maybe Caltech is no more what Caltech was supposed to be (so excellent) ? As a Caltech alumnus -- I get their fund-raising requests all too regularly. Their new motto is "There's only one -- Caltech." I must not be the only person who mentally appends either "thankfully" or "and one is more t

Re: DBWS vs other refinement programs

OK, admission time. I put the survey together and so all boo-boos are mine. I have no affiliation with Caltech who merely host the survey. For sure I could have broken out indexing from structure solution, and probably should have. Many programs I had never even heard of, let alone used, so

Caltech survey

I should add that most of the actual work of putting the survey up was done by Pavol Juhas (thanks Pavol), currently post-doc'ing with me, though boo-boos are definitely my responsibility. simon billinge wrote: OK, admission time. I put the survey together and so all boo-boos are mine. I hav

Re: Caltech survey

I tend to think that FULLPROF is the clear favorite of the magnetic scattering community, but I have no data to prove that. Interesting enough is the variation of the number of citations of this paper : RODRIGUEZCARVAJAL J RECENT ADVANCES IN MAGNETIC-STRUCTURE DETERMINATION BY NEUTRON POWDER D

Brass - isotropic thermal factor

Hi!   I’m a new subscriber of the Rietveld Mailing List.   I started to learn the Rietveld Method by reading the Young book "the Rietveld method" just three months ago and starting to do some tests with the FullPROF Suite program. So please forgive me if the most part of my questions wi

Re: Caltech survey

Interesting enough is the variation of the number of citations of this paper : RODRIGUEZCARVAJAL J RECENT ADVANCES IN MAGNETIC-STRUCTURE DETERMINATION BY NEUTRON POWDER DIFFRACTION PHYSICA B 1993, Vol 192, Iss 1-2, pp 55-69 In March 2001 : 441 citations in the ISI Science Citation Index, In Dec

Re: Caltech survey

I guess that is why it is called FULLPROF and not ASSISTANTPROF or ASSOCIATEPROF. Nice Shot!!!   Apu- Original Message - From: simon billinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, July 1, 2005 6:48 pm Subject: Re: Caltech survey > > > Interesting enough is the variation of the number of > > c

Re: Caltech survey

At 06:36 PM 7/1/2005 +0500, you wrote: I guess that is why it is called FULLPROF and not ASSISTANTPROF or ASSOCIATEPROF. Nice Shot!!! ...of course I've heard some of my colleagues (mis)pronounce it a bit differently... as FOOLPROF when they were having issues with it, and as FOOLPROOF after t