Re: [sdpd] Unrestrained SDPD future

2013-08-09 Thread Leonid Solovyov
As some people from the PRC reported that they can't see the files at Google due to Govern-Mental restrictions I put them into the SDPD-group folder: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/files/vn2075-DDM.cif http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/files/vn2075-DDM.png Restraints are everywhere

Re: Unrestrained SDPD future

2013-08-09 Thread Lubomir Smrcok
Hello everybody, the fact than many papers presenting results where refinements are flooded by tsunami of restraints appear, is main responsibility of referees and editors. For instance, CIF dictionary clearly defines restraints items, but they do not appear in many published CIF's. Good quest

Re: Unrestrained SDPD future

2013-08-09 Thread Alan Hewat
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813017522 > proposed as an instance of the SDPD future trend Fortunately this short paper is open access. http://journals.iucr.org/e/issues/2013/07/00/vn2075/vn2075.pdf It is truly a "tour de force" to quote N-H bonds determined to 3 significant figures from a

Unrestrained SDPD future

2013-08-09 Thread Leonid Solovyov
Dear colleagues, Since the restrained SDPD future has been announced in the respective list without a chance to go back: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/message/3016 It's my turn to put forward an alternative unrestrained variant that seems a bit more interesting and not so hopeless, IMH