I feel that checkCIF (and by extension, CCDC) is growing increasingly
hostile to us crystallographic bottom-feeders who ply our trade with powder
diffraction data. I'm sure that members of this group share my frustration
in getting inappropriate complaints like a missing Flack parameter,
_diffrn_m
The 1992 edition lists 2.790 for s = 0.60 and 2.517 for 0.65, so I guess
that tells you when the error appeared.
On a side note, and at some risk of being flamed, I'm curious why any
crystallographer would care.
Best to all,
Peter
**
Peter W. Stephens
SUNY Distinguished P
Does anybody know where I can find the source code of the powder indexing
software ITO?
All the best,
Peter
**
Peter W. Stephens
SUNY Distinguished Professor Emeritus
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Stony Brook University
+++
Friends and colleagues,
We are organizing a microsymposium at the 2020 IUCr meeting on the topic of
Structure Solution and Poorly Crystalline Materials. We want to feature
important recent work, especially that points toward the future development
and diffusion of knowledge in this topic. If you
Use of a chopper won't improve on the limit imposed by shot noise. You're
probably better off chasing down the cause of the low angle background.
**
Peter W. Stephens
Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy
Associate Dean for Research and Facilities, College of Art
Jim,
\What do you mean by automated? Controlled by a computer with (presumably)
stepping motors? Robot sample changer?
**
Peter W. Stephens
Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy
Associate Dean for Research and Facilities, College of Arts and Sciences
Stony Brook
I don't have an answer to all the symptoms you describe, but it seems
likely that your scintillator has died. Loss of intensity and of detector
energy resolution sound like water has gotten into the (very hygroscopic)
NaI scintillator. When it happened to me, it was with a Bicron detector.
Don't re
I believe that if you contact the ICDD directly, they will be happy to
provide.
**
Peter W. Stephens
Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy
Associate Dean for Curriculum, College of Arts and Sciences
Stony Brook University
(631) 632-8156
http://mini.physics.sunysb.
You seem to be confusing beq (thermal parameter) with site occupancy. At a
start, I would think that the site would have the same thermal parameter
for either atom, and refine occupancies that sum to unity. For example,
site A1 occ Fe feocc .9 x 0 y 0 z Az .055 beq Abeq 2
site A2 occ Ru =1-feocc;
How much mismatch? If you're getting a good profile fit, I'd be inclined
to doubt that it is a consequence of preferred orientation. You could mix
your sample with another material (corundum powder, cork) to try to reduce
the degree of preferred orientation, and see if that makes a difference.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo