Andrew S. Wills wrote :
>Armel, how would you feel about accepting magnetic data? -are you accepting
>all waifs and strays (sdf's in French)? :-) Or perhaps Alan, you would prefer
>to house them at the ILL.
I think that sounding opinions about doing or not a database, and
asking to researchers i
Dear All,
I think that standardisation is an important topic at the moment- the dawn of
a database of diffraction patterns. If you take a look through the different
formats that GSAS and FULLPROF can accept (I name those only for convenience)
it is a bit of a jungle- I include of course both 2-ax
At 22:14 07/11/99 -0200, Helio Salim de Amorim wrote:
>I think that PowBase is yet a remarkable step and your public domain
>character a very important aspect. I think also, that is not necessary a
>hard standardization but a few directions like,
>- the data must be an ASCII file.
>- unpublishe
Lachlan wrote :
>When/if powder programs are CIF friendly, the viewer used
>could be up to the user - i.e., viewing in Q space in
>programs such as Winplotr.
The current format used in PowBase is diplayed also by
Winplotr (INSTRM=0).
>Initially, it would be nice if authors of the common
>powde
