> To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded
> devices
ageist!!!
On 2020/02/14 10:50 , Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
> When the software probe projects started I offered to make a FreeBSD
> port version. The developers said that that was a good idea and
> they would come back to me.
A FreeBSD port would be nice, but may be a significant amount of work.
Philip
If it's interesting to the community I could fire up a software probe at my
house where I've also got a v4 probe. That way it would be a fairly direct
comparison, even down to the hardware & software probe being in the same switch.
~P.
-Original Message-
From: ripe-atlas On Behalf Of
Hi Robert,
weirdly, some of the SW probes are showing as "online" but do not provide any
measurements results [event the Built-in ones], such as your mentioned 130
[Latest data point shown is from 2019-12-17 11:57 UTC]
Also for example measurement
"Philip Paeps" writes:
> It should be fairly straightforward to run the software probe on FreeBSD
> under the Linux binary compatibility layer ("Linux personality
> disorder"). I've been meaning to poke at this but so many projects ...
> so little time.
When the software probe projects
To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded
devices, their capabilities are nowhere close to anything else one runs
Linux on nowadays.
Note that our team is also analysing the similarities/differences, but
if someone else also wants to look, these are good candidates
