[atlas] Tomhais STARTTLS: Cad a tharla?

2024-03-01 Thread Niall O'Reilly
Back in December 2022, there was a proposal to support STARTTLS measurements. (https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/2022-December/005234.html) I wonder, whether this proposal was implemented ? I've just tried using the measurement definition form (https://atlas.ripe.net/measurements

Re: [atlas] Probe with ever changing upstreams/ASs?

2023-08-04 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 3 Aug 2023, at 18:53, Robert Kisteleki wrote: > At the end of the day, measurements involving this probe would give varying > results depending on time. It's totally real, but is it useful? Hmm. If Carsten (or anyone else who may wish to offer a bit of [] bandwidth to "the world") would fin

Re: [atlas] Probe DHCPv6 support

2023-05-16 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 15 May 2023, at 19:57, Simon Brandt via ripe-atlas wrote: > As far is i can see, you can only use OpenWrt in DHCPv4 client mode _OR_ in > DHCPv6 client mode. IIUC, this is true per interface, but it's possible to configure more than one interface on a single hardware device. The WAN link on

Re: [atlas] Shiny new v5 probe reveals problem with virtual probe

2022-12-01 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 1 Dec 2022, at 9:50, Michel Stam wrote: FYI he v5 is basically a modified Turris Mox. You’re getting a nice Turris collection there :) Truly! World domination from Prague. 8-) IPv6 works is a tag that is added based on the result of a few measurements, see here: https://atlas.ripe.net/do

[atlas] Shiny new v5 probe reveals problem with virtual probe

2022-11-30 Thread Niall O'Reilly
Hello, everyone. TL; DR: clue needed configuring Turris Omnia for virtual Atlas probe. I'm delighted to have a shiny new v5 probe, which is operation since the day before yesterday. The new probe has been automatically tagged "IPv6 Works". On account of this, I've noticed that my virtual probe,

Re: [atlas] Tagging probes which are using the ISP's DNS server?

2022-10-11 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 10 Oct 2022, at 13:42, Robert Kisteleki wrote: Here's a quick-and-dirty answer to this: what the tags could look like if we applied them. This is about the ~12K connected probes, which collectively have ~23K resolver entries. Note: in this experiment the "more specific tags win", i.e. if qu

Re: [atlas] V5 probes

2022-10-07 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 6 Oct 2022, at 11:11, Daniel AJ Sokolov wrote: > That's pretty cool! +1 > So my v1 is not that rare, given there are still some 440 connected. -1; mine died ... Niall -- ripe-atlas mailing list ripe-atlas@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-atlas

Re: [atlas] Tagging probes which are using the ISP's DNS server?

2022-10-07 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 6 Oct 2022, at 13:32, Simon Brandt via ripe-atlas wrote: If the distinction isn't to difficult to implement, I would prefer these three types as system tags: Inside-AS DNS Outside-AS DNS RFC1918 DNS At least these are necessary, but I'm not sure that they are sufficient. For example, "In

Re: [atlas] swapping a v1 for a v3

2021-12-10 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 10 Dec 2021, at 0:37, Randy Bush wrote: > a sweet old v1 probe, 2285, in a hard to access (due to covid) place > died 19 months ago. i want to swap in a v3, 25898, this weekend. i > know i could create a new entry, but how do i delete the old; or better > yet, move the data from old to new?