"Ponikierski,
Grzegorz via ripe-atlas"
Reply to: "Ponikierski, Grzegorz"
Date: Tuesday, 2 July 2024 at 11:38
To: "ripe-atlas@ripe.net"
Subject: [atlas] Atlas probes in non-production networks
Hi all!
I discovered a disturbing practice how RIPE Atlas probes are used b
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 02:30:13PM +,
Ponikierski, Grzegorz via ripe-atlas wrote
a message of 149 lines which said:
> RIPE Atlas probes are not tagged and separated into groups that can
> be used appropriately for public and internal/private measurements.
This is not enirely true, RIPE At
Which ASN does this relate to ?
Colin
Sent from my iPod
> On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:13, Ernst J. Oud wrote:
>
> Grzegorz,
>
> Are these software of hardware probes? If hardware then the “experiment” they
> are used in has cost RIPE funds for the hardware. In my opinion that is worse
> than usin
Grzegorz,
Are these software of hardware probes? If hardware then the “experiment” they
are used in has cost RIPE funds for the hardware. In my opinion that is worse
than using SW probes.
Regards,
Ernst J. Oud
Met vriendelijke groet,
Ernst J. Oud
> On 2 Jul 2024, at 11:38, Ponikierski, Grze
Hi Grzegorz,
While I don't have an immediate response about whether/what RIPE ATLAS should
do, I'm curious to know whether there's a simple criterion (e.g., ASN?) to
select the probes in question. I'd like to see whether my measurements show any
bias for them.
I'm asking publicly because othe
Hi all!
I discovered a disturbing practice how RIPE Atlas probes are used by at least
one major provider which significantly impacts measurement results and
interpretation of these results. I want to share it with you to open discuss
about how to deal with such cases.
I was doing traceroutes f
