Hi,
> I don't believe it would be very likely that no one would step up if the
> seat really was vacant.
Unfortunately I know of at least two instances where that has happened
in the past few years, after repeated calls for volunteers when the
in-situ chair was stepping down, or had not decided w
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, 05.00 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list, <
ripe-list@ripe.net> wrote:
>
> It could also be the other way round. People might be discouraged to
> run
> against the long-time chairs.
>
>
> Exactly, that's was my point, it looks that I was not able to find
> the bes
Dear all -
could this person please be in touch by PM?
Or be recommended to me by somebody else, also by PM?
Thanks & best,
-C.
Dear colleagues,
I think we all agree that the overall goal is to have a good and diverse
set of WG chairs and we want to work with all WGs to facilitate that.
Following the recommendations from the Accountability Task Force, we've
started looking at the chair selection criteria of all RIPE Worki
On 11.02.2021 11:52, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
> Come on Jordi, you know better than that...
>
You too, Jan ;-)
Arnold
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/02/2021 09:00, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote:
2 or 3 terms, plus a "freeze period" (1 term? 1 year?) to avoid
cases where a chair "jumps" to another WG.
I would completely support this if there weren't already problems
in getting enough people to take on the extra workload of
>
>> 2 or 3 terms, plus a "freeze period" (1 term? 1 year?) to avoid
>> cases where a chair "jumps" to another WG.
>
> I would completely support this if there weren't already problems in
> getting enough people to take on the extra workload of becoming a WG
> chair.
