>> if the RDD developer folk in general were to centralize on a platform...
> Broadcast Appliance/CentOS *is* RHE, in all but name and logo.
Just curious, are there any plans/dates of a transition to CentOS6 as
the base?
sjm
___
Rivendell-dev mailing li
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 08:48 -0800, Kevin Miller wrote:
> On 07/08/2013 07:19 AM, Gary wrote:
>
> > if the RDD developer folk in general were to centralize on a platform
> > like RHE or Suse Linux Enterprise Server - SLES with a longer life
> > span would resolve to a more stable platform with grea
It's also worth noting that all Ubuntu LTS releases (12.04, 14.04, etc)
carry a full 5 year support period for both the desktop and server
variants. And there's a new version every two years for those that want to
stay on top of things (as opposed to RHEL/CentOS which only sees major
version update
Hi Gary,
> In the big pic the fast moving revisions of the Linux freeware seems to be a
> deal breaker with many RDD
> installations. Just my perspective... if the RDD developer folk in general
> were to centralize on a platform
> like RHE or Suse Linux Enterprise Server - SLES with a longer li
On 07/08/2013 07:19 AM, Gary wrote:
if the RDD developer folk in general were to centralize on a platform
like RHE or Suse Linux Enterprise Server - SLES with a longer life
span would resolve to a more stable platform with greater support. I
believe it is
Actually they have. RD used to be bui
On Jul 8, 2013, at 12:31 52, Rob Landry wrote:
> I have darkice and icecast running reliably under a variety of Linux
> distributions at several stations, no problem. But the streaming encoder is
> always on a separate machine from Rivendell. I'm a bit puzzled why anyone
> would want to stream
On Jul 8, 2013, at 11:19 24, Gary wrote:
> if the RDD developer folk in general were to centralize on a platform like
> RHE or Suse Linux Enterprise Server - SLES with a longer life span would
> resolve to a more stable platform with greater support.
Broadcast Appliance/CentOS *is* RHE, in all
On Jul 7, 2013, at 15:54 11, G Wood wrote:
> Just another comment... my experience with SLES - Suse Linux Enterprise
> Server has shown excellent stability over long periods of time (6 or more
> years) with a guaranteed life span of 7 years by the vendor. Although SLES
> 11.2 the latest, SLES
On Jul 7, 2013, at 16:59 24, Cowboy wrote:
> Aren't all RPM the same ?
> ( compatible at least )
At the file-format level, yes. However, different distros use different
package naming conventions and library versions, effectively making RPMs from
different distros incompatible. It's a crap sh
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013, Gary wrote:
...so the big picture remains that installation of Rivendell is no
longer my main thorn in my side, but the streaming chain: Jack / Encoder
/ Icecast.
I have darkice and icecast running reliably under a variety of Linux
distributions at several stations, no
On Jul 7, 2013, at 15:54 11, G Wood wrote:
> Now for my feature request... how about building a jack supported, streaming
> encoder into RDD? That way the Darkice drama is done with. I used to have
> hair when I started in this business and now I think pulled most of it out.
There are defin
Rob thanks for your post. My two cents on the hardware: I recently purchased
an HP Proliant DL 380 G4 / two - dual core Xeons, 4gb ram then set it up with
raid five all under $100.00 through Craigslist. Like you say everything has
its price and I ran into the same hardware limitations with Cen
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, G Wood wrote:
Your post Fred is helpful. I found this post from the past and thought
I'd try to resurrect it. I am curious about the RDD Broadcast
Appliance, I have downloaded it several times from the Paravel site but
have encountered repeated corrupt installs, errors r
13 matches
Mail list logo
