[RDD] Twitter rlm

2019-09-05 Thread Alan Smith
On some google searching looks like the twitter rlm may not be functional for the v2 branch?  Last update I found when searching this was 2010.  Just wondering if that is still the case? What about the 3.x branch? Thanks, -Alan ___ Rivendell-dev m

Re: [RDD] Twitter rlm

2019-09-05 Thread Fred Gleason
On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 05:50 -0500, Alan Smith wrote: > On some google searching looks like the twitter rlm may not be > functional for the v2 branch? Last update I found when searching > this > was 2010. Just wondering if that is still the case? That's been dead for years. Basically, ever sinc

[RDD] beta to production...

2019-09-05 Thread Timothy Elwell
Can't seem to find the email chain now that discussed moving from Riv 3 beta to the full production release. This was installed via the beta install scripts from Fred on CentOS7. Is it as simple as 'yum remove rivendell', then downloading the new scripts and running that installer or are there

Re: [RDD] beta to production...

2019-09-05 Thread le père Léon
Le 05/09/2019 à 22:19, Timothy Elwell a écrit : > Can't seem to find the email chain now that discussed moving from Riv 3 > beta to the full production release. This was installed via the beta > install scripts from Fred on CentOS7. > > Is it as simple as 'yum remove rivendell', then downloading t

Re: [RDD] beta to production...

2019-09-05 Thread Timothy Elwell
Tried that. It did do some updates, but still indicates the version as 3.0.0rc3. (it's possible I wasn't at rc3 when I did that, but when I run it again, it says there are no more updates.) I was thinking I remembered an email that said the best thing to do to update to the full release was un

Re: [RDD] beta to production...

2019-09-05 Thread Fred Gleason
On 9/5/19 3:23 PM, le père Léon wrote: > > yum update rivendell ? That will not get you the production versions, as those are (very intentionally) published in a different repository from the beta/release candidates. On Sep 5, 2019, at 16:36, Timothy Elwell wrote: > Tried that. It did do s