This is exiting times. Seems like Clark Kent or Bruce Wayne wants to
join the team. But, not to be known by their real names but their
aliases; SuperCoder or The Caped Coder. Not that I have much say in
this discussion, but I do believe that Rockbox will live on without
anonymous submissions and I
What a shame.
Guys, what about this "In reflection we cannot afford to lose good
coders. The problems between us and BC run deeper than anything that
was published online. Let's face it, we simply clash at some
undefinable core level. The rule put in place at the moment of that
crash see
/me throws head in the ring...
firstly i dont understand why you would want to stay annonymouse.. i
like the egoboost of seeing my name on the web :D
of course, i dont dont see what the big deal is.. so put him down as
gl or mickey mouse, i mean, whos to say thats not his real name? also,
like it m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
gl wrote:
>
> After Linus was about to commit one of my patches, it turns out the
> project leaders are not willing to accept contributions under a
> pseudonym. This may be normal in the GPL world, but for someone from
> the Windows / BSD license wor
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 13:33 -0500, Neon John wrote:
> Unfortunately you're not the first developer run off by this petty
> power ploy. I certainly hate to see it but there is little I can do
> as a user other than express my displeasure.
If you care about this issue so strongly, I think the most
Hi,
Neon John wrote:
>Even though I use my real name in places like this I don't think I'd want it
>plastered all over the net in software.
>
>
Maybe I don't understand the "privacy in software" madness, but your
name has been recorded all over the rockbox mailinglist archives. Those
archives
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Neon John wrote:
From a legal/copyright angle, I find this amusing coming from the same
people who flagrantly reverse-engineered and de-scrambled the binaries of
more than one commercial product, the EULA for which undoubtedly prohibited
same. This seems to be a highly sel
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:36:18 +0100 (CET), Daniel Stenberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, gl wrote:
>
>> After Linus was about to commit one of my patches, it turns out the project
>> leaders are not willing to accept contributions under a pseudonym. This may
>> be normal in the
Unfortunately you're not the first developer run off by this petty
power ploy. I certainly hate to see it but there is little I can do
as a user other than express my displeasure.
If I were still writing software I'd be in your camp. Even though I
use my real name in places like this I don't thi
On 3/8/06, [IDC]Dragon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sad, and (not less sadly) not the first time...
>
> The second time, right?
> It's not like we're scaring off hurds of developers.
Right. I didn't want to let it sound like that.
If I remember correctly, at the first time it would have been a
p
> sad, and (not less sadly) not the first time...
The second time, right?
It's not like we're scaring off hurds of developers.
gl, sorry to lose you, as you seemed to become a valuable contributor. Hint:
You could still quietly come back with your real identity ;-)
Or you join forces with Bluechi
gl wrote:
After Linus was about to commit one of my patches, it turns out the
project leaders are not willing to accept contributions under a
pseudonym. This may be normal in the GPL world, but for someone from
the Windows / BSD license world, this seems utterly bizarre. An
open-source pro
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, gl wrote:
After Linus was about to commit one of my patches, it turns out the project
leaders are not willing to accept contributions under a pseudonym. This may
be normal in the GPL world, but for someone from the Windows / BSD license
world, this seems utterly bizarre.
here we go again...
gl wrote:
After Linus was about to commit one of my patches, it turns out the
project leaders are not willing to accept contributions under a
pseudonym. This may be normal in the GPL world, but for someone from
the Windows / BSD license world, this seems utterly bizarre.
On 3/8/06, gl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After Linus was about to commit one of my patches, it turns out the project
> leaders are not willing to accept contributions under a pseudonym. This may
> be normal in the GPL world, but for someone from the Windows / BSD license
> world, this seems ut
After Linus was about to commit one of my patches, it turns out the project
leaders are not willing to accept contributions under a pseudonym. This may
be normal in the GPL world, but for someone from the Windows / BSD license
world, this seems utterly bizarre. An open-source project should
I've now completely implemented this, as well as enabling arbitrary battery
and volume level enums (and various other WPS features & fixes) - it's
exactly right.
Patch & demo WPS here: http://www.rockbox.org/bugs/task/4802
Note that there's a change from my previous example; there is no step
Hi,
Hristo Kovachev wrote:
>IRC Nickname: Bg3r (@ work), Bger (@ home)
>CVS Username: Bger
>
You should register 1 main nickname, and link the other with /msg
nickserv link.
That way we can get a cloak for Bger, and it will automaticly be copied
to the other nick.
Tomas
18 matches
Mail list logo
