I've been running cvs-060304 for some time...obviously. Tonight I had
the weirdest thing happen. Was wondering if anyone could shed some light
on what might have caused this. It's no longer an issue as I've updated
to the latest daily and the problem is resolved though I really have a
feeling I cou
> >gl has a right to continue to moan until the politics of the project
> >change to his satisfaction.
Always amazes me how nobody ever seeks a "compromise" an "amicable" solution.
It always comes down to "I'm right and You're wrong" :(
> Thanks but I have no desire to do that. My point is
On Wed, 04/05/06 at 12:29:42 +0100, gl wrote:
>
> >gl has a right to continue to moan until the politics of the project
> >change to his satisfaction.
>
> Thanks but I have no desire to do that. My point is about consistency.
> Either my work is going to be accepted, or it isn't. Don't refuse
Just to let you know that from now on there is a new VMware image on the wiki that enables you to compile all parts of rockbox from the start.Please report any problems in the wiki page:
http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/VMwareDevelopmentPlatformOn 26/03/06, XavierGr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> w
moved to dev-list.
> It would also make it easier to add extra filtering
> to suppress the spurious Off events with low battery on recorder
> v1.
So I am not alone then... :-D
On 4/5/06, Jens Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04.04.2006, Manuel Dejonghe wrote:
>
> > are you using ? I perce
Maybe they need to take this a live flamewar battle on IRC. We could all
get on and spectate. One shall stand, one shall fall
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 21:36 +1000, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
> oh FFS.. can u take this crap to private email or pm on the forums and
> just stop it? seriously, of all the
hello, I've downloaded and installed rockbox yesterday on a iaudio-x5
I love it ! and I've subscribed the mailinglist to see how I could help
: I can confirm this thread has a bad impact on me, but I know you will
find the way out
anyway, thanks to everyone here
you rock !!!
~samsouk
Michael E.
Jvo Studer wrote:
> gcc uclpack.o src/libucl.a -o ../uclpack
> ld: archive: src/libucl.a has no table of contents, add one with
> ranlib(1) (can't load from it)
> make[2]: *** [../uclpack] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [uclpack] Error 2
> make: *** [tools] Error 2
I don't have the SH compiler installed o
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Jvo Studer wrote:
gcc uclpack.o src/libucl.a -o ../uclpack
ld: archive: src/libucl.a has no table of contents, add one with ranlib(1)
I added ranlib on the .a file in CVS just now. Please try that and see if it
helps!
--
Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- htt
On 4/5/06, Jvo Studer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone help me with my problem? Actually I don't neeed the ucl
> compressed files because I need the sh1-CC only for checking if my
> patches compile fine on all targets.
Then you can probably edit the makefile (or the configure script that
cr
if you only want to make sure it compiles, do the sim build... as long
as your patch isnt #defined out for sim builds u should be fine
On 05/04/06, Jvo Studer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello my devs!
>
> I could finally successful install the 'sh-elf' crosscompiler on Darwin
> 7.9. (MacOS 10.3.9
Hello my devs!
I could finally successful install the 'sh-elf' crosscompiler on Darwin
7.9. (MacOS 10.3.9). The problem was that in binutils-2.16 I had to
delete 3 '*.m' files in the 'gprof' folder for getting binutils
compiled. And also newlib-1.11 is necessary along gcc-3.3.6 in order to
ge
oh FFS.. can u take this crap to private email or pm on the forums and
just stop it? seriously, of all the ppl that are subribed here, i
tihnk _MAYBE_ 2 ppl care.
build a freeking brigde and get over it
On 05/04/06, gl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > gl has a right to continue to moan until the po
My God, man, LET IT GO. We all appreciate that you have continued to
find and report bugs, but overall you are doing far more harm than
good with your constant whining and your puerile e-mails.
Shame on you for trying to restrict the freedom of speech in this way!
gl has a right to continue
gl has a right to continue to moan until the politics of the project
change to his satisfaction.
Thanks but I have no desire to do that. My point is about consistency.
Either my work is going to be accepted, or it isn't. Don't refuse my
patches, but take exactly the same work from me witho
Michael
My God, man, LET IT GO. We all appreciate that you have continued to
find and report bugs, but overall you are doing far more harm than good
with your constant whining and your puerile e-mails.
Shame on you for trying to restrict the freedom of speech in this way!
gl has a right to
My God, man, LET IT GO. We all appreciate that you have continued to
find and report bugs, but overall you are doing far more harm than good
with your constant whining and your puerile e-mails.
gl wrote:
Please. Not again.
Where's that apology Daniel?
--
gl
I immediately jumped to the inference that Linus means
"crediting people ...won't happen again" (from "there" meaning "the above
link")
...he could well have meant, "eschewing creditation ...won't happen again"
I hope that's tongue in cheek BC. Otherwise, props on your blind optimism
: ).
What's an accusation without supporting evidence?
http://www.rockbox.org/viewcvs.cgi/uisimulator/win32/uisw32.c?rev=1.28&view=log#rev1.17
Hehe. Looks like I had a soft moment there. Won't happen again, promise.
Linus
Now that respect and token-gratitude are declared signs of weakness,
I a
Bluechip wrote:
Bluechip wrote:
What's an accusation without supporting evidence?
http://www.rockbox.org/viewcvs.cgi/uisimulator/win32/uisw32.c?rev=1.28&view=log#rev1.17
Hehe. Looks like I had a soft moment there. Won't happen again, promise.
Linus
Now that respect and token-gratitude
Bluechip wrote:
Now that respect and token-gratitude are declared signs of weakness,
I am sure you will keep that promise.
I thought better of you Linus, really, I honestly thought YOU were above
such pettiness.
Wasn't it kind of petty to bring up the "evidence" in the first place?
Or did I m
Bluechip wrote:
What's an accusation without supporting evidence?
http://www.rockbox.org/viewcvs.cgi/uisimulator/win32/uisw32.c?rev=1.28&view=log#rev1.17
Hehe. Looks like I had a soft moment there. Won't happen again, promise.
Linus
Now that respect and token-gratitude are declared signs
Please. Not again.
Where's that apology Daniel?
--
gl
Please everyone, don't get up upset by this (I mean, linus, daniel etc.)
and stop rockboxing.
I would be gutted if it all ended because of this sillyness.
Linus Nielsen Feltzing wrote:
Bluechip wrote:
What's an accusation without supporting evidence?
http://www.rockbox.org/viewcvs.cgi/uisimula
Bluechip wrote:
What's an accusation without supporting evidence?
http://www.rockbox.org/viewcvs.cgi/uisimulator/win32/uisw32.c?rev=1.28&view=log#rev1.17
Hehe. Looks like I had a soft moment there. Won't happen again, promise.
Linus
>My problem is that Linus on the one hand rejects my patches because, I quote
>"we do not want to work with anonymous people", but then happily
accepts and
>commits my fixes _without credit_! And then rubs my face in it.
... You continue to accuse the main developers ...
What's an accusati
26 matches
Mail list logo
