Exactly, they are not claiming any sort of trademark infringment, only
copyright. There is absolutely no need to bring trademarks into this.
>From Christopher Wood's earlier post it's clear that the only thing
they could claim copyright infringment on would be "sufficient amount
of literary or pic
In adversarial situations such as this, it is usually best to give as
little information as possible. You never know when your adversary can
find a way to turn something around and use it against you. For
example, your statement below can be viewed as an admission that you/we
*were* violating
you should have also mentioned that it was once named bejewelled and
changed very recenlty to jewled because u take copyright and trademark
and stuff seriously..
On 16/04/06, Björn Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You wrote:
> > The game PluginJewels, for use on RockBox and available at
> > ht
cd my_manual
../tools/configure
Select platform (ie 9 for H1x0)
Select M for manual
Make
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton Romanov
|Sent: 15 April 2006 20:05
|To: Rockbox development
|Subject: Manual
|
|how to build manual from so
Not that I've already built the manual myself, but I thought you had to
select the manual with configure and then just make?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton Romanov
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 9:05 PM
> To: Rockbox develop
how to build manual from source?
cause 'make manual' just says
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `buildmanual'.
--
You wrote:
> The game PluginJewels, for use on RockBox and available at
> http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/PluginJewels, is a blatant
> copyright violation of Bejeweled, the popular match-three game owned by
> my company, PopCap Games, Inc., of Seattle, Washington, USA. I am
> writing to
I would agree also.
I quote the US Copyright office (http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl108.html),
-
The idea for a game is not protected by copyright. The same is true of the
name or title given to the game and of the method or methods for playing it.
Copyright protects only the particular man
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Tomas Salfischberger wrote:
You can ask him to contact someone by phone, and explain his problem, just
to make sure he understands what we do etc. I think Daniel or Linus would be
a good choise for that phonecall, or some native English speaker with legal
knowledge. (Do we
Hi,
Dominik Riebeling wrote:
>sure, I'm appending the complete CnP'ed mail text (don't know how to
>forward this message including headers as attachment with gmail).
>
>
Ok, looks good to me.
You can ask him to contact someone by phone, and explain his problem,
just to make sure he understands
Hi Tomas,
On 4/15/06, Tomas Salfischberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you get us the full mail headers? Just to make sure the message is
> real? In some way this doesn't feel genuine to me...
sure, I'm appending the complete CnP'ed mail text (don't know how to
forward this message including
Hi Dominik,
Can you get us the full mail headers? Just to make sure the message is
real? In some way this doesn't feel genuine to me...
Tomas
Dominik Riebeling wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I just received the following mail today -- I guess because I recently
>edited the wiki page (at least it shows me
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:21:27 +0200, Dominik Riebeling wrote:
> I hope we can solve this issue pretty quickly.
While game play is similar it is far from the same (and in fact some key
features of the 'original' game play are not there), the code has not been
copied, but is self-written without a
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 09:39:48PM -0400, bk wrote:
> How can they say there are copyright violations? Clearly none of the
> code is theirs since the Rockbox code is open and their game is
> proprietary, and the plugin author didn't copy any graphics, right?
>
> There's no trademark violations an
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:21:27 +0200, "Dominik Riebeling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I just received the following mail today -- I guess because I recently
>edited the wiki page (at least it shows me as the last editor of the
>page up to now) and my mail address can be found on the wiki.
15 matches
Mail list logo
