On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:10:03, Paul Louden wrote:
> Ideally we should start with "what do we want from a version control
> system?" What role does it serve in our project? How do we intend to
> use it? What features does it need to have? What features would be
> nice to add on to those?
Most of the
I haven't done any rockbox hacking in a while (other than changing the keymap
on new releases to work around the broken REC button on my X5) but I have
served as lead developer on two projects in my company in the last several
years. I transitioned one of those projects from Subversion to Mercu
I'm not terribly interested in this feature but an idea occurred to me
while scanning your messages about 'undo'.
How about this: a click in the opposing direction within a short time --
say 1 or 2 seconds -- jumps back to the previous position *without*
halving the distance.
I presume the t
I'm not terribly interested in this feature but an idea occurred to me
while scanning your messages about 'undo'.
How about this: a click in the opposing direction within a short time --
say 1 or 2 seconds -- jumps back to the previous position *without*
halving the distance.
I presume the t
rockbox-dev-requ...@cool.haxx.se wrote:
Hello friends!
I'm happy to announce that Rockbox 3.3 was just released!
FYI: The source archive appears to be missing from the server. I'm
getting a 404 error on:
http://download.rockbox.org/release/3.3/rockbox-3.3.7z
~ray
XavierGr wrote:
Path FS#9455 has stirred up some discussion on IRC which led to a dead end.
Currently, forward-scrolling (bidirectional scrolling isn't a matter) in
Rockbox pads exactly 3 spaces at the end of the string, to differentiate
between the last and first letters of the string.
Personal
DervishD wrote:
No, IANAL, but I read Groklaw a lot... ;)
Well, that's almost like being a lawyer without having to eat human
flesh ...
Very funny! I love it! :-)
~ray
Sorry for being so late with this response. It's been a busy week and I
really wanted to respond to Daniel's comments...
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Ray Lambert wrote:
The GPL has a specific reason for existing. It's to protect the hard work
of programmers fr
Karl Kurbjun wrote:
> On Ray's arguments: I do not think that relicensing would ever be a
> possibility unless we had our own copyright holding entity - I doubt that
> the FSF would ever agree to let us relicense under anything but the GPLv3
> or above. I am sure there would also be plenty of head
Bryan Childs wrote:
> On 9/11/07, Ray Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For my part, I am strongly against "TiVo-ization" and I believe that if
>> the GPLv3 DRM provisions prevent someone from taking our code and
>> "TiVo-izing" it without our kno
DervishD wrote:
> * Ray Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
>> I would recommend that, upon making this move, we require that all
>> submitters henceforth explicitly license under "GPLv3 or later"
>
> What's wrong with "GPLv3", without the
Bryan Childs wrote:
>
> Just so this thread isn't hijacked / diverted :
>
> http://forums.rockbox.org/index.php?topic=7694.0
Thanks for the link. Very sad...
~ray
Karl Kurbjun wrote:
> Are the DRM clauses still in the GPLv3? I personally do not like DRM and
> I would rather it have never come about, but in the off chance that a
> company really decided that they liked the project and wanted to use it
> as their primary firmware, what would those clauses mea
Here's my $.02 ...
First, as for my code, I'm happy releasing it under any version of the GPL
and I actually encourage the group to move to GPLv3.
I would recommend that, upon making this move, we require that all
submitters henceforth explicitly license under "GPLv3 or later" and we
should chang
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
> On 06/06/07, Ray Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just to add some fuel to the fire, I also implemented a callback
>> interface when I wrote my A/B repeat feature. It's defined in
>> firmware/export/audio.h and implemented in firmwar
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
> hey all,
> so, in IRC we somehow got onto the problem that the filebrowser needs
> to know when a track changes (so the follow playlist can work
> properly), and scrobbler and database also need to know when this
> happens.
> playback.c has a few callbacks but only allows o
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> We discussed and actually agreed on a fair amount of random issues. Lots of
> bad jokes, fine Belgian beers and the webcam feed contributed to the fun.
Daniel, if I had known you would have Belgian beers I would have made the
trip from Boston! :P (That, and the fact that
Kate has a nice built-in "Find In Files" feature -- look for the tab
beside the Terminal tab. It's basically a GUI front-end for grep, but
it's convenient: no mucking with a separate console and the FiF window
tiles alongside your documents.
It also has things like word completion, code folding,
Another $0.02 just to make your pockets jingle...
I agree with Daniel that there has to be a line drawn. At some point
you've got to just do it. The real question is: where do you draw the line.
I disagree with those calling for a beta release. The problem with a
beta release is that it im
In adversarial situations such as this, it is usually best to give as
little information as possible. You never know when your adversary can
find a way to turn something around and use it against you. For
example, your statement below can be viewed as an admission that you/we
*were* violating
Hi,
I think my Archos JBFMR has died. I'm hoping someone may know a trick
to fix it or at least be able to confirm it's fate...
Everything seems to work fine but it won't play; there's no sound output
and the track time does not advance. It goes through all the motions, I
can still FFWD an
Cam wrote:
If there's a policy, let's see it, let the policy makers defend their choices.
They don't have to explain their choices to anyone and you're in no
position to demand that they do. They have no obligation to you or
anyone here. This is their choice to make and they've made th
Brandon Low wrote:
Hey, I've just gotten AB repeat to work on the iRiver H340 platform
(really not much to it, I was able to use the existing code with minor
modifications).
The existing AB repeat mode is enabled by a repeat mode option. This
seems tedius and unnecessary on platforms lik
Tobias Heimann wrote:
Hi guys,
I've just started to develop a plugin for rockbox and stumbled over the
memory allocation:
Is there anything like malloc() and free() in rockbox and if yes, which
headers do I have to include for that?
So far, I've only found buffer_alloc() in buffer.h, but th
FWIW: I agree with those who have voted to keep this 'auto next directory'
feature an option and set to OFF by default, and for the same reasons
(i.e. established directory structure and usage patterns).
Beyond that though, I'd like to remind folks that (IMHO) it's not
generally a good idea to cha
25 matches
Mail list logo
