Re: Credits

2009-09-23 Thread Robert Menes
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Alex Parker wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm not too clear why we have a separate manual credits file - IMO a > contribution to any part of Rockbox significant enough to get recognition > should be in the same credits file.  I'd like to add the

Re: Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Rafaël Carré
al mail, only the reply from > > Daniel > > > > > > It showed up in my spam folder > > Ah, looks like it did here too, weird.. And 11 other rockbox emails in my gmail spam folder (from flyspray, commits, and this credits message) -- Rafaël Carré signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Maurus Cuelenaere
Op 22-09-09 21:56, Hilton Shumway schreef: On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Maurus Cuelenaere mailto:mcuelena...@gmail.com>> wrote: P.S.: I never received the original mail, only the reply from Daniel It showed up in my spam folder Ah, looks like it did here too, weird.. Regards, Mau

Re: Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Hilton Shumway
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Maurus Cuelenaere wrote: > > > P.S.: I never received the original mail, only the reply from Daniel > > Regards, > Maurus Cuelenaere > It showed up in my spam folder Hilton A selected quote: Claims of humanitarian concerns are merely a fig leaf over a naked powe

Re: Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Maurus Cuelenaere
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Alex Parker wrote: I'm not too clear why we have a separate manual credits file - IMO a contribution to any part of Rockbox significant enough to get recognition should be in the same credits file. I'd like to add the three people in CREDITS-MANUAL who aren&#x

Re: Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Al Le
On 22.09.2009 19:28, Alex Parker wrote: I'm not too clear why we have a separate manual credits file This may stem from the fact that the manual wasn't an integral part of Rockbox in its early days, i.e. part of SVN etc but was rather developed in Wiki or otherwise. IMO a contr

Re: Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Rafaël Carré
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:30:35 +0200 (CEST) Daniel Stenberg wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Alex Parker wrote: > > > I'm not too clear why we have a separate manual credits file - IMO > > a contribution to any part of Rockbox significant enough to get > > recognition

Re: Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Johannes Linke
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:30:35 +0200 (CEST) > Von: Daniel Stenberg > An: Rockbox development > Betreff: Re: Credits > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Alex Parker wrote: > > > I'm not too clear why we have a separate manual credits f

Re: Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Daniel Stenberg
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Alex Parker wrote: I'm not too clear why we have a separate manual credits file - IMO a contribution to any part of Rockbox significant enough to get recognition should be in the same credits file. I'd like to add the three people in CREDITS-MANUAL who aren&#x

Credits

2009-09-22 Thread Alex Parker
Hi all, I'm not too clear why we have a separate manual credits file - IMO a contribution to any part of Rockbox significant enough to get recognition should be in the same credits file. I'd like to add the three people in CREDITS-MANUAL who aren't in CREDITS to CREDITS and th