On Tuesday, 27. September 2011 10:36:33 Nick Peskett wrote:
> I've a feeling if this has to be decided before it can go in, it'll
> never happen.
That was exactly my point, too ;)
Thomas
On 27/09/2011 09:21, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am Di, 27.09.2011, 08:41 schrieb Nick Peskett:
It seems something unexpected came up in the last month...
Would anyone else mind checking the patch with a view to checking it in?
Thanks for reminding. I expected the countdown difficult to be to do a
Am Di, 27.09.2011, 08:41 schrieb Nick Peskett:
> It seems something unexpected came up in the last month...
>
> Would anyone else mind checking the patch with a view to checking it in?
>
> It's quite trivial now, I've pared the patch down so it changes as
> little as possible, there's probably more
On 26/08/2011 07:46, sideral wrote:
After much IRC discussion, it turned out that my first assessment (that
there would be little to no concern about the T&D menu move) was wrong.
Discussions are still ongoing on how to change the menu in the short and
long term. Personally, I'm only marginally
On 28 August 2011 06:15, Thomas Martitz wrote:
>
> Its unfortunate that you let the single hypocrite win. Really everyone else
> agreed with moving t&d to settings.
>
> Perhaps I'll just move it afterwards...just cause.
>
> Best regards.
"how to win friends and influence people" (y)
sideral schrieb:
Jonathan Gordon writes:
> On 23 August 2011 09:08, sideral wrote:
>> Given that it looks like there's overwhelming support for (and little
>> to no concern about) moving Time& Date to Settings, I now think it's
>> fine to do that change along with the pr
Jonathan Gordon writes:
> On 23 August 2011 09:08, sideral wrote:
>> Given that it looks like there's overwhelming support for (and little
>> to no concern about) moving Time & Date to Settings, I now think it's
>> fine to do that change along with the proposed sleep-timer
>> extensions. [...]
