On 15/01/07, Jonathan Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
Well the idea came up in irc yesterday about possibly adding a plugin
which would add extra tags to the wps without overloading the core,
anyway, its sort of finished and I want t know what people think and
weather its committable?
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
Well the idea came up in irc yesterday about possibly adding a plugin which
would add extra tags to the wps without overloading the core, anyway, its
sort of finished and I want t know what people think and weather its
committable?
I think it
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
Well the idea came up in irc yesterday about possibly adding a plugin
which would add extra tags to the wps without overloading the core,
anyway, its sort of finished and I want t know what people think and
weather its
I second that. What problem are you trying to solve?
Mostly my boredom.
Also trying to think of ways to add functionality without affecting
the core size.
As for making a new plugin to do the whole wps, I thought everyone was
against that idea?
On 17/01/07, mat holton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan Gordon wrote:
I second that. What problem are you trying to solve?
Mostly my boredom.
Also trying to think of ways to add functionality without affecting
the core size.
As for making a new plugin to do the whole wps, I thought
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Simon M. wrote:
If we have the wps in a plugin (which is then a tsr plugin) what happens if
I want to load another plugin? Or another tsr plugin?
Why would it be a TSR?
--
Daniel Stenberg -- http://www.rockbox.org/ -- http://daniel.haxx.se/
You're right about that, but I think that would be a rather small penalty for
running your own wps like this. Also, a TSR can't do anything with the GUI so
it would take some new trick if that's desired.
Then I hope very much that it is never considered to move existing wps
functionality to a
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jan 2007, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
Well the idea came up in irc yesterday about possibly adding a plugin
which would add extra tags to the wps without overloading the core,
anyway, its sort of finished and I want t know what people think and
weather its
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, David Hall wrote:
Those who value core size over eye-candy would have a nice, clean and
simple WPS interface very similar to today (with arguably less
cruft), while those who want massive eye-candy WPSs would have a way
to implement them without
