[Citadel Development] Re: Massive difference in the size of the binary..

2020-10-01 Thread IGnatius T Foobar
>Thought to make the comment.. big difference in the size of the binaries.. >"unpatched" was a recent (like, week or so) easyinstall.. What's the date on the unpatched version? I thought we got rid of that a long time ago. There was some sort of build/diagnostic option that I neve

[Citadel Development] Re: Subject Line patch/fix..

2020-10-01 Thread warbaby
Yes, I should have just attached a proper patch..for some reason I've been thinking I don't have permission for file attachments. Regarding this html/visibility issue.. I'm testing a webcit installation with CKeditor [see attached.] ..working on getting a nice little (not overly complex) con

[Citadel Development] Massive difference in the size of the binary..

2020-10-01 Thread warbaby
In the interest of time, I just rolled out the binary to my other mail server. Thought to make the comment.. big difference in the size of the binaries.. "unpatched" was a recent (like, week or so) easyinstall.. "citserver" is what I just complied with the subj/string fix. It was a clean git pul

[Citadel Development] Re: Subject Line patch/fix..

2020-10-01 Thread warbaby
I'll email you privately on that.. thanks! > Wed Sep 30 2020 06:58:55 PM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored >Subject: Re: Subject Line patch/fix.. > >Ok never mind about the upload, I viewed your message in WebCit and the >change that needed to be made appeared clearly. > >Before I co