[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-16 Thread ParanoidDelusions
I'm wondering if the process of moving from an already fully allocated VM to one on a local thinpool, if you'll be able to step that VM back from full allocation to dynamic.  Sun May 16 2021 15:45:01 EDT from s3cr3to Subject: Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-16 Thread s3cr3to
On 5/15/21 2:39 PM, IGnatius T Foobar wrote: You *could* use database_cleanup.sh to recover disk space on an older server. I seem to remember a post where you mentioned that it was not possible to do this in my current version. I'm not sure what your VM storage looks like, but on my VMs

[Citadel Development] Re: citadel-1620778956-x86_64.appimage -- looks like it's working?

2021-05-16 Thread ParanoidDelusions
According to Proxmox, just because you've returned freed blocks back to the host system doesn't mean you'll see an increase in your available space in your thinpool. I think it has to do with "largest contiguous blocks" of free space. But I think the bottom line is that you may free space, but