Hi!
That is for bAnsi:1 to set if ansi. Good job over all!
James
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
> Aleksey Bragin wrote:
>> Shouldn't the LARGE_UNICODE_STRING be used there instead?
>>
> On Windows the window name is ANSI for an ANSI caller and UNICODE for a
> UNICODE caller
cgut...@svn.reactos.org wrote:
> +DbgPrint("%S: %d test executed (0 marked as todo, %d failures),
> %d skipped.\n", TestName, total, failures, skipped);
Nice! Though testman won't parse this if you don't change "test" to
"tests" ;-)
Best regards,
Colin
___
James, We hope you have a full and quick recovery. Looking forward to having
you back in the battle.
> Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 02:41:14 -0500
> From: jimtabor.ros...@gmail.com
> To: ros-dev@reactos.org
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 47295: [WIN32K / USER32]
> Convert the w
Hi all,
I am new to this mail group and have a question that probably needs
your kind of technical knowledge to answer. I want to use reactos,
however, up to its completion, can I use some libraries on windows to
replace them? In example, wine libraries can be superseded by original
windows librari
If I understand you correctly, you want to replace ReactOS dlls with Windows
dlls?
Well, it's illegal under the Microsoft Windows EULA, but if that doesn't
stop you, bare in mind it probably won't work, as ReactOS does not directly
clone Windows in all areas and in some areas things are implemented
I think he meant the reverse. He wants to use Reactos DLL's in windows.
2010/5/23 Andrew Faulds
> If I understand you correctly, you want to replace ReactOS dlls with
> Windows dlls?
> Well, it's illegal under the Microsoft Windows EULA, but if that doesn't
> stop you, bare in mind it probably w
Oh. That's an even worse idea. Ruining a licensed copy of windows,
possibly irreparably.
On 23 May 2010 20:43, magnus johnsson wrote:
> I think he meant the reverse. He wants to use Reactos DLL's in windows.
>
> 2010/5/23 Andrew Faulds
>
> If I understand you correctly, you want to replace Reac
Yes that is what I want, is it illegal and impossible?
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, magnus johnsson wrote:
> I think he meant the reverse. He wants to use Reactos DLL's in windows.
>
> 2010/5/23 Andrew Faulds
>>
>> If I understand you correctly, you want to replace ReactOS dlls with
>> Wind
I mean I want to compile reacos dlls for windows and use them inside
windows to replace a few original windows executables and dlls to make
it more secure...
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:55 PM, ahmet alper parker wrote:
> Yes that is what I want, is it illegal and impossible?
>
> On Sun, May 23, 20
Why would it make it more secure?
In this case it's not illegal, it is legal, but you'll ruin your windows
installation, and make it very unstable or even entirely unusable.
ReactOS dlls are not safe to add to windows.
On 23 May 2010 20:59, ahmet alper parker wrote:
> I mean I want to compile re
The only way it is going to make Windows more secure, is due to making
applications NOT running on Windows. I am not sure if this is what are you
trying to achieve...
2010/5/23 ahmet alper parker
> I mean I want to compile reacos dlls for windows and use them inside
> windows to replace a few o
Yes. A Windows install that doesn't start up is FAR more secure than a
Windows install that does.
On 23 May 2010 21:09, Olaf Siejka wrote:
> The only way it is going to make Windows more secure, is due to making
> applications NOT running on Windows. I am not sure if this is what are you
> tryin
For reasons of security of course. Don't you ever have a better answer
except these jokes? Personally, I do not like microsoft, ok? Is this
answer enough for you? why many of people chose to use open source
software? Their one another reason is the ability to manage the source
code to vulnerabiliti
You weren't listening were you?
ReactOS doesn't work properly at all. Windows will NOT WORK AT ALL if you
replace dlls in it with ReactOS dlls.
ReactOS is still in early alpha, it is extremely unreliable, terribly
incomplete and is not secure.
It has thousands of vulnerabilities, and is no way more
ahmet alper parker wrote:
> Why kindly supply some more technical answer
> instead of joking?
>
>
In theory ReactOS ntoskrnl can be loaded by ntldr from Windows 2003.
Together with reactos hal it might actually "boot" (for a low enough
value of boot). You would also need reactos ntdll, as it's s
THANK YOU VERY MUCH! :)
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
> ahmet alper parker wrote:
>> Why kindly supply some more technical answer
>> instead of joking?
>>
>>
> In theory ReactOS ntoskrnl can be loaded by ntldr from Windows 2003.
> Together with reactos hal it might actuall
16 matches
Mail list logo
