Yeah, I agree, this needs some love...
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 10:48:36 +0200
From: elh...@gmail.com
To: ros-dev@reactos.org
Subject: [ros-dev] Compatibility List moderation
Speaking about bug reports drama, im still watching how there are several
people that are still sending totally useless com
Apologies accepted.Thanks for being polite.I'll try to improve my debugging and
testing skills to prevent any other outbursting against me.
Sorry, as well, for those who had witnessed it.
Best regards
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 14:04:26 +0200
From: cae...@gmail.com
To: ros-dev@reactos.org
Subject: [
I am sorry to Vicmarcal for outbursting on ros-dev. The reason for that was
yet another pointless bugreport, after my requestes, passed several times,
regarding bug reports quality.
Sorry, Vicmarcal, as well as those who had to witness it.
Regards
___
Ro
Hi Sir Caemyr!
Please I am still waiting your public apologies because your offensive email.
>Its not the point of testing every random app there is. Such tests are
>useless, if they do not provide any precise error or in any other way show
>precisely any bug/deficiency in ROS. What >are those
Okay guys...
Enough of it, not need to give such an image of the ReactOS project.
Victor, you've already been said several times (and not from Olaf only) that
some of your bug reports were lacking consistency, details, interest, whatever.
Or even some of your answers (let's think about bug #5657
Please take this offline, this is not a discussion for ros-dev.
Thanks.
From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of victor martinez
Sent: 06 May 2011 11:35
To: ros-dev@reactos.org
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Vicmarcal - are you mad?
>In case of anyone h
>In case of anyone having any doubt, my reference to craziness/madness in
>initial message was purely a figure of speech.
In case of anyone having any doubt, his reference to craziness/madness in
initial message was purely a way to offend.
Yours faithfully, Sir Caemyr.
As a humble follower of the ReactOS project since 2007, I have seen many
arguments on the ROSDEV mailing list and IRC, as well as the official forums.
Please, remember that these information channels are all public, and flaming,
trolling, or whatever you call it is completely exposed to the publ
In case of anyone having any doubt, my reference to craziness/madness in
initial message was purely a figure of speech.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
vicmarcal - I have a lot of mental conditions and a disability. In fact
these affect me enough (as well as other work) that I find it difficult to
make real contributions to ROS other than the occasional patch here and
there. If there is a problem it may be worth letting people know about it
Speaking about bug reports drama, im still watching how there are several
people that are still sending totally useless compatibility test results to
ROS database...
I want to ask for a moderation system for that, and i would want to offer
myself to moderate new incoming results, such as Wine syst
Its not the point of testing every random app there is. Such tests are
useless, if they do not provide any precise error or in any other way show
precisely any bug/deficiency in ROS. What are those for? What is the point
of passing report same as in my afforementioned example (AKA app doesnt
work,
Hi Caemyr!
I am quite worried you didnt notice my mental status before, as I have been
around for almost 3 years now. I am trying to get over this small handicap.
Meanwhile, maybe you can begin looking yourself, reflect on your overreacted
email and apologize.
I am pretty easy to find on IRC s
I do not know about you but I would rather spend time dealing with reports
that are detailed and concise than waste time dealing with a very vague
report; whether or not the report is from a developer. Wasting time is not
good. Sure better to have *concise* bug report than no bug report, but
@Olaf,
yes, i agree that devs need useful bug reports, with debug logs, and regress
tests if possible but, its always better to have a bug report than to
not to have them, isnt it?
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Adam wrote:
> Although Olaf does indeed have a point. And vicmarcal was on IRC
15 matches
Mail list logo
