Hi Timo,
I'd say go for it. I have no strong objection to introduce some changes
before 0.4.0, as long as it's not too intrusive or add some real added
value (unimplemented modules/parts).
I'd like to have it for more than for simplification sake. Some parts of
win32k are in a sorry state
It is possible that the entire VAD range is not committed, so we have to
sweep over all the PTEs in the sub-range to check. If one of the PTEs is
zero AND the entire VAD is not marked as committed, then we're sure that
the range is not committed. Also, if the PTE is marked as decommitted,
same
I was thinking that a VAD with the Committed flag set would be entirely
committed, so we could avoid all PTE checking. But I guess the flag
stays set, even if we decommit ranges inside it. In that case it's clear
that we need to check for decommitted pages.
Regarding your change, I see the
I always liked C++, and it was my main development language before I
joined ReactOS. Indeed let's not rush, think/discuss through all
possible things and then start gradually going for it for code pieces
which are good (which means GDI first of all).
Regards,
Aleksey
On 21.02.2015 17:05,
Hi
I'd like to propose introducing C++ to win32k. Don't worry, this is not
a suggestion to rewrite everything from scratch in C++, but to gradually
introduce C++.
The reason is not That's what Windows does, but the fact that
especially GDI would heavily benefit in terms of code simplicity,
In such situations, please update all the langages files and not only
English. This makes work easier for translators to track changes.
On 21/02/2015 13:52, gadamopou...@svn.reactos.org wrote:
Author: gadamopoulos
Date: Sat Feb 21 12:52:58 2015
New Revision: 66383
URL: