Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 42333: - Handle case when RosGdiSetDeviceClipping is being called without rects at all (with a respective DPRINT1). - Use combined clipping object everywhere to en

Op 3-8-2009 0:26, Steven Edwards schreef: > I keep seeing these comments, 'see arwinss nr. #'. Where do I go to > look this up? > > Thanks > http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Arwinss I'd guess ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reacto

Re: [ros-dev] Regarding Bug 4810 and building the evil GCC 4.4

Op 24-8-2009 0:11, Daniel Reimer schreef: > Hi. > While at it, do you guys have a QEMU build tutorial as well? Just asking, as ReactOS 0.3.10 seems to be bundled with QEMU 0.9.0 while already QEMU 0.10.5 is out. I don't know if ReactOS works with a more recent QEMU, didn't try yet. Win32/64

Re: [ros-dev] Regarding Bug 4810 and building the evil GCC 4.4

Op 24-8-2009 17:32, Dmitry Gorbachev schreef: > ReactOS works with the latest QEMU. I compile QEMU from trunk. > > About bug 4810, a fix have been sent to Daniel. > If it also implies that ReactOS 0.3.11 (hopefully including its original goals of latest FireFox and OpenOffice working on it, th

Re: [ros-dev] Network Breakage

Op 7-9-2009 7:54, James Tabor schreef: > Hi, > Sometime back a month ago we lost networking initialization. At this > time, after each boot I have to reapply network settings manually. To > go back from July and regression test each build is a heavy task to > ask for anyone. I do hope someone has a

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48236: Create a branch forcmake bringup.

Op 30-7-2010 23:52, Andrew Faulds schreef: We need this, else it may be another millennia until 0.3.12... -- Nothing wrong with celebrating (likely soon upcoming) commit 50.000 by releasing it as 0.3.12 or so ^^. ___ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev

Re: [ros-dev] 0.3.12 milestones status

Can the 0.3.12 branch be obtained in some easy way in order to test? Trunk has at least an ISO of each revision, testing 0.3.12 branch requires a SVN client? As you've supported VmWare earlier as testing platform for releases, I assume you'll release a complete image including an easy way to i

Re: [ros-dev] 0.3.12 milestones status

he driver to ReactOS. As for bugs, every single one should be reported in bugzilla, but you surely can ask questions and consult bugs on IRC. OK, hopefully some wishfull stuff regarding the download tool will count as bug as well (FireFox 4 beta , Chrome, FileZilla). wi

Re: [ros-dev] 0.3.12 milestones status

Op 11-10-2010 20:44, Olaf Siejka schreef: MSI works well enought with older versions of Windows Installer. It can for example handle WinDbg msi packacge correctly. It has some problems with install packages of the newer version. Since those require installing and running a service, it could be

Re: [ros-dev] Please tell me

Op 25-10-2010 16:09, Fan Zhang schreef: Thanks. But I don't know if i run ReactOS, how could I replace the kernel file, such as ntoskrl.exe ? So basicly running a ReactOS installation with RosBE installed as application, sources downloaded and modified, and then you want a way to update files

Re: [ros-dev] Wine Gecko

Op 27-10-2010 20:45, Colin Finck schreef: The mshtml winesync in question has occured shortly after 0.3.11 had been released, so this also affects trunk builds for quite a while now. To make a long story short: Thanks for your detailed explanation Colin, everything seems to have its perfectl

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

Op 10-6-2011 16:13, Timo Kreuzer schreef: Any remarks, objections, wishes, doubts? http://reboot.pro/14412/ lists a modified FreeLDR (for PXE?) and CHAIN.C32 (Syslinux multiboot bootloader module). I'd hope ReactOS can be booted from (FreeLDR on) all of the following (ofcourse 1 step at a tim

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

Op 13-6-2011 9:28, Timo Kreuzer schreef: It is possible to store the bootsector on a floppy. You cannot put reactos on a floppy. It is possible yes, just not working right now. Perhaps broken code or broken floppy driver. ReactOS 0.2.7 is able to store FreeLoader (2.0) and bootsector to flopp

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

Op 15-6-2011 7:17, Ameen Ross schreef: Most Linux distros nowadays can boot from ISO. Even with persistent changes. ah so you're claiming something like this would work out of the box: label ubuntu1104 kernel memdisk append iso initrd=ubuntu.iso To my knowledge, Linux ISO booting consisted of

Re: [ros-dev] freeldr

Op 15-6-2011 19:56, Ameen Ross schreef: ah you're using GRUB with some of its internal commands, seems like you're quite right, be it due to GRUB, Ubuntu or the combination. Thanks for your response. I suggest we'll continue this thread sometime once ReactOS has the same capabilities of memo

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 53085: [FREELDR] - Add back apparently lost line of r52098. Patch by Alex Ionescu, tested by Igor Paliychuk. See issue #6292 for more details.

Op 5-8-2011 19:56, Jérôme Gardou schreef: Credits go to Cameron Gutman for the idea. Le 05/08/2011 19:54, jgar...@svn.reactos.org a écrit : Author: jgardou Date: Fri Aug 5 17:54:06 2011 New Revision: 53085 URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=53085&view=rev Log: [FREELDR] - Add back app

Re: [ros-dev] lwIP testing request

Op 18-8-2011 10:35, Oleg Baikalow schreef: I will ask Aleksey to update my branch, and I will pick up a different task for ReactOS this time. Your OS really becomes usable, good work! If I remember correctly lwIP was recently either merged into trunk, or into Cmake version of ReactOS. I'd agre

Re: [ros-dev] Re : Re : Another regression

Op 16-8-2011 22:35, Cameron Gutman schreef: ACPI does work on VirtualBox. I performed the majority of my testing on VirtualBox. Also, I need a stack trace from that crash to have any clue where the corruption is (still not much of one). I have had indications of a pool corruption bug in ACPI a

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 53399: [VMWINST] Fix amd64 build

Op 4-9-2011 17:10, Jérôme Gardou schreef: Le 23/08/2011 10:58, tkreu...@svn.reactos.org a écrit : What about : [VMWINST] Get rid of this useless relic. I mean it's something we have to maintain, it was written for antediluvian vmware versions, and I see no reason to have such a thing. I may as we

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 53399: [VMWINST] Fix amd64 build [NTDLL] add missing amd64 specific exports [MSVCRT*] Fix mangled c++ exports for amd64 [OLEAUT32] Add amd64 adm stub for call_meth

Op 4-9-2011 17:24, Aleksey Bragin schreef: It's written for the most common testing platform of ReactOS, the maintaining effort spent over years was minimal, and it just does its job very quickly, even with VMWare 7 (provided you copy necessary video driver files from its CD to modules\optional w

Re: [ros-dev] Re : [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 53399: [VMWINST] Fix amd64 build [NTDLL] add missing amd64 specific exports [MSVCRT*] Fix mangled c++ exports for amd64 [OLEAUT32] Add amd64 adm stub for call

Op 4-9-2011 19:21, Sylvain Petreolle schreef: Vmwinst was meant to work with old vmware layout, and it grabbed the files automatically. Now you have to extract the files from the MSI package in order to have it working, which is far from a convenient way. If "vmwinst.exe" or the "new hardware

Re: [ros-dev] [VMWINST]

Op 4-9-2011 20:50, cae...@myopera.com schreef: What's worse, it is using some ugly methode of detecting Vmware host, by probing one specific pipe. On other hosts, this attempt throws an exception. If we plan to run ROS tests with /FIRSTCHANCE this module needs to disappear. In my opinion, VMWI

Re: [ros-dev] trunk is broken Re: [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 53896: [FREELDR] - Move some disk related stuff that is unrelated to the registry data into a new file, hwdisk.c - Don't get the disk count fro

Op 30-9-2011 12:17, Minas Abrahamyan schreef: Hi there, This patch is to blame (seems to, just this) or another... But trunk is broken: build stops with these messages: Are you sure? http://www.reactos.org/getbuilds/ has rev53904 built. Your issue might be compiler or build system specific o

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS August and September Meeting Minutes

Op 3-10-2011 19:01, Zachary Gorden schreef: kernel target. With these considerations, the project has decided to set both the user and kernel targets to Windows 2003. Dependency on Wine for many user mode libraries actually complicates this, as Wine has been adding Vista and later APIs without

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS August and September Meeting Minutes

Op 3-10-2011 20:14, Alex Ionescu schreef: I have yet to see drivers/hardware that requires Vista+. Best regards, Alex Ionescu I'll go look for USB3 controller drivers then with support for XP/2003 in both 32bit and 64bit flavors. Vmware's (WDDM?) virtual machine Windows graphics driver for O

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

Op 4-10-2011 2:53, Colin Finck schreef: Unfortunately, the CMake builds don't boot under KVM on the same machine, but apparently for everybody else. To give you an idea what I mean by "don't boot": http://img830.imageshack.us/img830/5145/image1iz.png If nobody has an idea how to debug or fix thi

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

Op 4-10-2011 18:08, Cameron Gutman schreef: On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:06 AM, cae...@myopera.com wrote: The mere fact that we have to deal with this only detracts from the development of real code. As you're (most likely correctly) excluding the possibility of SeaBIOS (which is in heavy develo

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

Op 4-10-2011 22:14, Pierre Schweitzer schreef: I've just run the said test. As you can see, no real difference: http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/3831/debugdiablo.png Did that test machine also choke on a ISO generated by Windows Cmake, or only on the Linux Cmake generated ISO? This test is

Re: [ros-dev] Two petitions

Op 16-10-2011 10:48, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schreef: "1) Unless it's enabled by default I say yes." Oh, why not? it would be great if ReactOS comes with themes support and, with one applied by default Or maybe you want to keep OS as simple as possible by default Taste is a person

Re: [ros-dev] CMake migration of Trunk_x86_GCCLin Debug Buildslave

Op 5-10-2011 1:29, Colin Finck schreef: I have now reverted everything back to the RBuild scripts. Will set up a side-by-side solution with manual CMake builds as soon as possible - unless somebody solves all problems in the meantime :) If I recall correctly Timo recently managed to fix a React

Re: [ros-dev] 1000 EUR for ReactOS - We have made it!

Op 15-11-2011 19:35, Ged Murphy schreef: 1000 EUR for 810 place? What did first place get, a bailout sum equivalent from Germany? Nah they got the total sum of all greece's taxes, or also 1000 euro, whichever is more :p First 1000 all get 1000 euro each so total sum of 1M. Enjoy finding a g

Re: [ros-dev] Qemu Recoverable Assertion when Loading Gecko

Op 18-11-2011 21:12, Jérôme Gardou schreef: Out of curiosity, how much RAm did you allocate for your VM ? running with only 64 (or 48) MB of RAM is a nice way of detecting/finding issues. Trunk seems to reliably install/act on a minimum of 96MB, while for example 0.3.11 only needed 48MB (see

Re: [ros-dev] November meeting minutes are there.

Op 3-12-2011 19:52, Jérôme Gardou schreef: You will find them on the forum : http://reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=9918 Thank you very much for the quick notes about a productive meeting. Hopefully the next release will feature QEMU 1.0 bundled with the LiveCD download. __

Re: [ros-dev] November meeting minutes are there.

Op 3-12-2011 21:34, Sven Barth schreef: A curious question regarding this: wasn't mm already rewritten a rather short time ago? Or did I understand it wrong what the ARM devs did there? Some things are getting rewritten a lot, getting better and better during each iteration, with occasionally

Re: [ros-dev] Call for testing in preparation to 0.3.14

Op 6-12-2011 21:40, Aleksey Bragin schreef: Hello testers, your help is greatly needed. Trunk needs to be tested using this template as a guideline http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Tests_for_0.3.14 Testing against [ http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Installing_ReactOS ] is much more entertaining. How ar

Re: [ros-dev] Notepad and Text

Op 11-12-2011 0:55, James Tabor schreef: Has anyone noticed notepad? While user32_winetest win> data, then notepad data! The balance program go into high speed swapping!! Awesome to see how long the memory manager can keep swapping without crashing, shows things are getting robust. (ntoskr

Re: [ros-dev] 0.PI branching

Op 18-12-2011 18:08, Aleksey Bragin schreef: as the results of the trunk testing depict, there are no major problems/regressions (compared to the previous release). Thus I propose Those tests were only related to installing & running/using applications on an installed ReactOS? Any comments

Re: [ros-dev] 0.PI branching

Op 18-12-2011 18:57, Igor Paliychuk schreef: This bug will not be fixed before release. It needs a lot of new code. That kinda contradicts the earlier statement "there are no major problems/regressions (compared to the previous release)" as 0.3.13 didn't suffer from such an issue. I guess it's

Re: [ros-dev] 0.PI branching

Op 18-12-2011 22:49, Aleksey Bragin schreef: Try other virtual machines for now, this is the only thing I can advise until it's fixed. VMWare Workstation (Player), Parallels Workstation, they don't exhibit the bug. 64MB VMware Workstation 8 (64bit, Win7-ultimate x64) guest hangs all the same,

Re: [ros-dev] Proposal for FF support drop

Op 15-1-2012 16:34, Andrew Faulds schreef: Why not just drop support for FF entirely from rapps? I'd say better no browser than a terribly outdated one. If users want FF they can do this: C:\ReactOS> ftp ftp> open ftp.mozilla.org ftp> cd pub/firefox/releases/8.0/win32/en-GB ftp> get Firefox

Re: [ros-dev] Proposal for FF support drop

Op 15-1-2012 19:56, Daniel Reimer schreef: Guys, you know that we already host FF 2 on our SVN Server? Check the link. It will NEVER become outdated Oops the link displayed by rapps includes a version number in the binary instead of some [ ftp://ftp.reactos.org/reactos/rapps/firefox-2in32.exe

Re: [ros-dev] RosBE-Unix 2.0-RC2

Op 15-1-2012 1:17, Cameron Gutman schreef: I built a working CMake BootCD with RC2 on OS X Lion 10.7.2 and Xcode 4.2.1, so the issue with the previous RC seems to be gone. Does it get rid of the "P:\Trunk_slave\x86_Cmake\build" part in debug logs? Come to think of it, I guess it's Cmake on

Re: [ros-dev] December 2011 meeting minutes

Op 17-1-2012 20:36, Jérôme Gardou schreef: You will find attached to this e-mail the minutes for the meeting of 2011. A topic as also been opened on the ReactOS forum :http://reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=10352 Thank you. Good to know a 0.3.14 will be released sometime (be it January

Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting - skipping another meeting this month

Op 26-1-2012 9:50, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schreef: well... there are several regressions between 0.3.13 and 0.3.14-RC Is there a list somewhere of 0.3.14-RC feedback? The forum topic only asks for testing against applications, not testing phase 1 (bootCD/Usetup) and phase 2 (Sys

[ros-dev] Cmake result differences

I was wondering why the Cmake results are different between the Windows/ReactOS and Unix/Linux platforms. The compressed trunk CD images available for download differ by about 6MB. Expecting identical output (checksums, file sizes) on different platforms even with the same compiler isn't reali

Re: [ros-dev] Cmake result differences

Op 29-2-2012 12:09, Kamil Hornicek schreef: Dbg-win ISOs contain winetests, hence their bigger size. Also if you compare build times (http://build.reactos.org/waterfall) you will find out that the windows build slave is faster than the linux one, so dbg-win builds are actually available sooner de

Re: [ros-dev] Re : Cmake result differences

Op 1-3-2012 1:04, Sylvain Petreolle schreef: The Arwinss builds are available on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/reactos/files/Arwinss/ Thanks for pointing those test releases out. I guess the rate of changes and limited number of build machines might make an each-revision (just

Re: [ros-dev] Core developer

Op 8-5-2012 10:02, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schreef: " It just should be integrated into ReactOS" i recently asked about this at IRC and the answer is "not as of now" What about the following utility? It's kind of a workaround though: [ http://homepage3.nifty.com/takeda-toshiya/msdos/in

Re: [ros-dev] Disappeared thread in forum

Op 10-5-2012 9:19, Sven Barth schreef: Is it just me or did the complete thread "Feedback 0.3.14" (or so) on the forum by another Sven (I don't remember his full username) disappear from yesterday to today? Even in the "my posts" view my two posts that I have done in that thread aren't listed. A

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS fundraising campaign

s. Could work, with something like: * donate nn Euro and get a pressed ReactOS CD * donate nn+ Euro and get a USB Flash Drive containing ReactOS * donate nnn+ Euro and get a Raspberry Pi as dedicated ReactOS machine, running some bare Linux and ROS in QEMU 1.1 ? with best regards

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [tkreuzer] 57141: [FREELDR] Improve readability of sector calculation

Op 26-8-2012 22:21, Minas Abrahamyan schreef: The summary is that practically, treating size sectors as 512 bytes will work yet for very long time, and for near future it would be enough to align partitions. That said, in long run, naturally, it would be better to encounter real sectors' size.

Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting - August 2012

Op 28-8-2012 18:58, Александр schreef: I'd like to sujest adding to agenda 'resent UniATA progress'. Recent UniATA progress is nice indeed. Testing ReactOS would be easier though if there was no absolute requirement/dependency with regard to mass storage controllers and corresponding drivers.

[ros-dev] bootcd logfiles

Is there any documentation available for where ReactOS stores its logfiles? For a phase 2/3 installation to harddisk, obviously it gets stores on drive C: somewhere. For phase 1, screen and debugport (com/rs232) seem to be the only options. Same goes for the BootCD and LiveCD. As I'm experien

Re: [ros-dev] bootcd logfiles

Op 26-12-2012 20:07, Bernd Blaauw schreef: Is there any documentation available for where ReactOS stores its logfiles? For a phase 2/3 installation to harddisk, obviously it gets stores on drive C: somewhere. For phase 1, screen and debugport (com/rs232) seem to be the only options. Same goes

Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting December 2012 rescheduled

Op 27-12-2012 20:13, Aleksey Bragin schreef: Due to Christmas and New Year holidays this month's status meeting makes little sense. Preliminary it's rescheduled to January, exact dates will be proposed after speaking to our team members. I'm not sure if suggestions for topics/subjects are welc

Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting December 2012 rescheduled

Op 3-1-2013 9:01, Pierre Schweitzer schreef: AFAIK, PXE has been already worked by Hervé Poussineau, at least, in FreeLDR to try to provide such feature. But ReactOS was then unable to work on PXE, producing a BSOD. The code path needed wasn't implemented in the kernel. And unless I'm totally

Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting December 2012 rescheduled

Op 4-1-2013 11:10, Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO schreef: Great! Now our own bootloader (FreeLoader) must be adapted to boot-up PXE images (instead of using PXELINUX). My syslinux.cfg has the following, which might be entirely depending on int13 making it useless for protected mode OS like ReactOS :

Re: [ros-dev] Monthly meeting December 2012 rescheduled

Op 4-1-2013 13:10, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schreef: just one note... which image would be the "eligible" to be the "loader"? HEAD (which is constantly changing) or maybe latest public published release (which, as of now, is 0.3.14, too old for testing)? HEAD if the build managed to comp

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS On ARM/Raspberry Pi

Op 11-1-2013 11:36, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schreef: /__/ On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:41 AM, J. C. Jones mailto:jaibudu...@gmail.com>> wrote: "/_Why not port ReactOS to ARM?"_/ As was in the news today, start with an already ARM-enabled operating system (Linux, I'd suppose) and run

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS: Execute Natively or Virtually?

Op 19-1-2013 18:46, J. C. Jones schreef: Hi, Per email thread subject, I'd say it would be nice if ReactOS loads at all, critically only depending on a minimum set of requirements and having everything else loaded/working if possible, without ever hanging or stalling the loading process. A

Re: [ros-dev] reactos.org is down

Op 21-2-2013 10:08, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schreef: reactos.org is up for me now, yes wasn't there a 2013 newsletter, with MM, USB and some other stuff? Seems to have disappeared for the moment. Perhaps it was meeting minutes, but links don't work right now http

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-general] ReactOS ISO support has been added in Rufus

Pete Batard schreef op 3-1-2014 3:59: If you want to test, you can pick the latest ALPHA from: http://rufus.akeo.ie/downloads/ Awesome, will test using USB2 ports. Currently, the way this works is through installing Syslinux (v4.07) and mboot.c32 so that setupldr.sys can then be invoked (see