On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Colin Finck wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> After playing around with GitHub's features in
> https://github.com/colinfinck/sandbox for the last few days, it turns
> out that its server-side settings hardly prevent repository mess.
>
> Although I have set master to be a "prot
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Riccardo Paolo Bestetti
wrote:
>
> Windows Server 2003 is definitely supported by Microsoft (which doesn't mean
> it is supported by others, and it mostly isn't), but it is almost dead, and
> it would only do harm to deny that.
I had to jump in on this, because th
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Mike Swanson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 09:45 +, Oliver Schneider wrote:
>> I have worked with reposurgeon for nearly three years and it's the
>> only
>> comprehensive tool, I know of, to achieve lossless copies of a repo
>> in
>> another version control sy
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:54 AM, David Quintana (gigaherz)
wrote:
> I think the real goal with moving to a platform such as github is reducing
> the entry barriers for new contributors. As it has been mentioned already,
> almost all projects who moved from SVN with "send patches" contribution
> sy
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Ged Murphy
wrote:
> Are we not just looking for a solution to a problem that doesn't really
> exist? Is SVN stopping us from doing anything, or from changing to a better
> way of working for our project style? The move from CVS to SVN was worth
> doing, but is a mo
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Colin Finck wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> So I was about to finish my ongoing server work in the next few days and
> then push for a move to Git on the mailing lists. Thanks for spoiling
> those plans! :)
>
> I totally agree with all your raised points. I'm using Git every
