Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
Purpose wasn't to be rude or whatever. Just keep in
mind we aren't all English native-speakers and we may
not have the same understanding of that language than yours.
My fault, I probably just read your mail in the wrong context after a long
day at work.
I do however
Ged Murphy wrote:
I do however think it's a good idea to approach the foundation with a
request for a copy of 2k3, if you think it'll help the project.
The idea was to get a copy (or two) of Windows Home Server.
To make my long story in
?' and only
Pierre seemed keen.
Ged.
-Original Message-
From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of Colin Finck
Sent: 19 January 2011 16:19
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license for the
project?
Ged
Am 19.01.2011 18:04, schrieb Pierre Schweitzer:
Yeah that does make sense. However my point was, if only Pierre is going to
use it why not just get him his own copy.
True point. I actually thought I am not the only to practise test-based dev.
But looking at the (lack of) comments, it seems I
On Jan 19, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
Am 19.01.2011 18:04, schrieb Pierre Schweitzer:
Yeah that does make sense. However my point was, if only Pierre
is going to
use it why not just get him his own copy.
True point. I actually thought I am not the only to practise test-
based
access to at least one NT5 box.
Ged.
-Original Message-
From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of Colin Finck
Sent: 17 January 2011 16:05
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license for the
project
Would anyone actually use a remote machine for development?
I'd expect most devs to already have windows machines, I can't see how can
you be a ros/nt dev without access to at least one NT5 box.
Ged.
+ 1
Johannes
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ged Murphy wrote:
I think it's much more important to have a Windows build machine than it is
to have an remote machine devs can use as as a test bed.
Olaf's Windows build slaves are currently being integrated into our
BuildBot.
As stated, I could also donate and set up a Windows XP license
Colin Finck wrote:
Change NT5 to NT5.2 and the list should become quite short.
As long as no one proposes a major change, we are still heading for
NT5.2 compatibility (at least kernel-wise). And then we have to verify
that all our API implementations are not just compatible to some NT5
Hi,
Whilst parts of our kernel try to target 5.2 changes, from a testing
perspective it should be
pretty much identical to 5.1.
IMO, unless you're a kernel dev interested in implementing some of the more
elegant kernel
features in 5.2, then anyone with a 5.1 box is more than adequately
I think Ged is refering to MSVC-based buildslave more than just building on
Windows.
___
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
On 18 January 2011 18:51, Pierre Schweitzer
pierre.schweit...@reactos.org wrote:
Hi,
Whilst parts of our kernel try to target 5.2 changes, from a testing
perspective it should be
pretty much identical to 5.1.
IMO, unless you're a kernel dev interested in implementing some of the more
For my information??
You need to start your sentences a little more politely
Wasn't aware it was that impolite (cf:
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/for-your-information-FYI.html).
So, s/For your information/If I may bring that point to you Sir.
You're talking about testing
Pierre Schweitzer pierre.schweit...@reactos.org wrote:
Then, as I already expressed, I really push that idea.
Thanks for stating your opinion here.
Come on folks, I'd like to hear your opinions as well. Pierre can't be
the only one who still performs testing under Windows. At least I hope
Adam geekdun...@gmail.com wrote:
I recall that it also allows two RDP sessions, but then
nobody can log into the console without forcing a termination of one
of the sessions, and vice versa.
I've played around with Windows Home Server and its stripped down
version of Windows Server 2003 in
Hi,
our main target is w2k3, so this is quite logical to use it.
I know user-mode may target any Windows release, but in such case, I guess that
more devs have some Windows 7 running than a w2k3. So, testing user-mode stuff
is quite easy. Kernel-mode tests are really harder.
Then, as I already
Adam wrote:
Using an OEM license on a computer that the software has not originally
been distributed with is not legal (confirmed with a call to MS [...]
Of course, this is what every software vendor wants. But gladly, this
decision is not just up to Microsoft, but the local jurisdictions.
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:19:52 +1100, Colin Finck co...@reactos.org wrote:
Adam wrote:
Using an OEM license on a computer that the software has not originally
been distributed with is not legal (confirmed with a call to MS [...]
Of course, this is what every software vendor wants. But gladly,
Hi everybody,
I've been thinking about getting a license of an English Windows Server
2003 Standard 32-Bit for the project.
It could be installed on one of our servers and be made available over
RDP. This would enable project members to do development and testing
work on our actual target
I for one, only have a winXP pro license on which I do my tests.
Le 14/01/2011 16:46, Colin Finck a écrit :
Hi everybody,
I've been thinking about getting a license of an English Windows
Server 2003 Standard 32-Bit for the project.
It could be installed on one of our servers and be made
Any reason we're going with 2k3 and not a newer one?
2011/1/14 Jérôme Gardou jerome.gar...@laposte.net
I for one, only have a winXP pro license on which I do my tests.
Le 14/01/2011 16:46, Colin Finck a écrit :
Hi everybody,
I've been thinking about getting a license of an English
] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license for the project?
Hi everybody,
I've been thinking about getting a license of an English Windows Server
2003 Standard 32-Bit for the project.
It could be installed on one of our servers and be made available over
RDP. This would enable project members to do
: [ros-dev] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license for the project?
Hi everybody,
I've been thinking about getting a license of an English Windows Server
2003 Standard 32-Bit for the project.
It could be installed on one of our servers and be made available over
RDP. This would enable project
[mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of Zachary Gorden
Sent: 14 January 2011 17:26
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license for the
project?
Each seat comes with a number of builtin licenses. There is a slightly
different set of rules
] *On
Behalf Of *Zachary Gorden
*Sent:* 14 January 2011 17:26
*To:* ReactOS Development List
*Subject:* Re: [ros-dev] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license for the
project?
Each seat comes with a number of builtin licenses. There is a slightly
different set of rules with respect to terminal
Ged Murphy wrote:
It doesn’t allow more than one person to use the actual host machine for
development purposes.
The restrictions are indeed harder than I thought, but two concurrent
administrative connections using any accounts are possible (see
a single user licence and opening it up to the public.
Ged.
-Original Message-
From: ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of Colin Finck
Sent: 14 January 2011 15:46
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: [ros-dev] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license
[mailto:ros-dev-boun...@reactos.org]
On
Behalf Of Colin Finck
Sent: 14 January 2011 15:46
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: [ros-dev] Getting a Windows Server 2003 license for the
project?
Hi everybody,
I've been thinking about getting a license of an English Windows Server
2003 Standard
28 matches
Mail list logo
