Never mind. It was a bug in my override of the load() method within
Bill::DB::Object::Acct (didn't shift from @_ before calling
$self->SUPER::load(@_).
My bad! Many apologies!
-- Jeff Horn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey
Horn
S
I have a table that has a unique key on (encrypt_ver_num, e_acct_num,
pay_type_id) and a primary key of (acct_id).
The following code:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use Bill::DB::Object::Acct;
use Data::Dumper;
my $acct = Bill::DB::Object::Acct->new( pay_type_id => 1, e_acct_num =>
'c8923a1e7de803ac73372d64
Can you also post the table definitions? (Simplified, if necessary.)
On 5/17/07 5:19 PM, Wiggins d'Anconia wrote:
> 'company_branches' stores a one-to-many of companies to their branches.
> 'user_company_map' stores what I thought would originally be a many-to-many
> between the users and the comp
Based on my reading of the mailing list archives I have gathered that
what I initially was attempting is just not possible, that is to have a
many-to-many map_record be used as half of another many-to-many (if I am
wrong about that reading please correct). I can live with that, as long
as I can
Yes, Rose::Object. It had a bug that prevented Rose::DB::Object's new
"helpers" setup() parameter from working. Rose::DB::Object 0.765 will
require Rose::Object 0.84 or later once it's released, but you should
upgrade to Rose::Object 0.84 right now if you want the "helpers" setup
param to work wi
On May 17, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Michael Reece wrote:
> here is a bit of ugliness that hints at what i am after:
I think i do some similar stuff, so I'll give my advice -- which you
may be better off to not take ;)
I never use 'make manager methods'. i started it as a memory saver
because i us
On 5/17/07, Michael Reece <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my $count = $collection->count_assets_published(
> [ \'t2.pubdate >= NOW() - INTERVAL ? DAY' => $num_days ] #
> );
>
> i can't refer to 'asset.pubdate' in this query param, because RDBOM
> insists i use a scalar-ref here, and
in Collection.pm, i have
sub count_assets {
my $self = shift;
return CollectionAsset::Manager->get_collection_assets_count(
require_objects => ['asset'],
query => [ collection_id => $self-
>collection_id, @_ ],
);
}
s
On 5/17/07, Derek Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have gone down a similar path before,
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01792.html
Yeah, I was about to post that link. Thanks :)
> When you need to manipulate the map records themselves, setup an
> add
I have gone down a similar path before,
http://www.mail-archive.com/rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net/msg01792.html
The short story is that a map_record is not designed to be
manipulated, it's only there for convenience when fetching related
objects from a many-to-many relationship call, such
On Oct 24, 2006, at 12:26 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
>> b) i have it doing that already. it's just weird having a double
>> negative... it seems odd that found isn't in there already
>
> The success case is clear: you get a true return value back from
> load().
> When there's a failure, dependin
I'm fairly new to the "with_map_records" manager arg, and possibly this
is already available but I couldn't find documentation or an easy way to
achieve it. Is it possible to set fields of the mapping table during an
"add" operation. For example:
$company->add_users(
{
username => 'bob'
On 5/17/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you use_key on the primary key, rose doesn't do anything.
Fixed in SVN. Thanks for the report.
-John
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2
13 matches
Mail list logo
