On Wednesday 15 September 2004 05:05, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
> - My patch replaces references to Qt::whatever with the hardcoded color
> values. This is not all that pretty, but the probability of Qt::red
> being changed to a different RGB value are pretty low :-)
Silvan, I see you applied thi
On Tuesday 14 September 2004 11:05 pm, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
> It turns out that the problems with notes not displaying on MacOS X was
> also caused by a static initializer conflict, this time in colours.cpp.
> Basically:
>
> - On most platforms, static initializers in the qt shared libraries g
It turns out that the problems with notes not displaying on MacOS X was
also caused by a static initializer conflict, this time in colours.cpp.
Basically:
- On most platforms, static initializers in the qt shared libraries get
executed before static initializers in the main application.
- On Ma
On Tuesday 14 September 2004 21:07, Chris Cannam wrote:
> ghostview viewer. It might be using some other means though, like
> the built-in Qt QCanvas save/restore procedure.
No, the preview mechanism is part of the KDE printing framework, we don't even
see it. There's nothing specific to the QC
> On Monday 13 September 2004 02:06 pm, Vladimir Savic wrote:
>> Guys,
>> maybe I'm insane, but this looks like an idea...
>>
>> There is no proper way to handle segments that are at the top of each
>> other (I mean literaly) in the segment canvas. Why you don't make
>> something similar to flippin
On Tuesday 14 Sep 2004 18:33, Vince Negri wrote:
> Print itself is fine. (Checked by printing to PDF direct.)
Does the PDF display correctly in kghostview?
> But print preview is completely broken - and I mean completely. I
> don't have a screenshot to hand, but all I get is a preview window
> wh
> Print itself is fine. (Checked by printing to PDF direct.)
>
> But print preview is completely broken - and I mean completely. I don't
> have a screenshot to hand, but all I get is a preview window which is
> grey, with a single 1-pixel high line (comprising intermittent black
> dots) about 32 p
Silvan wrote:
But it's a damn sight better than I was expecting. Broken preview is far less
critical than broken printing. So this is progress indeed, and maybe worth
the effort of having the futzed up crazy font config thing.
That reminds me of something I've been seeing in the CVS builds I've
On Monday 13 September 2004 02:06 pm, Vladimir Savic wrote:
> Guys,
> maybe I'm insane, but this looks like an idea...
>
> There is no proper way to handle segments that are at the top of each
> other (I mean literaly) in the segment canvas. Why you don't make
> something similar to flipping of eve
