On Sunday 11 Dec 2005 21:50, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote:
> HEAD - No Jack
> 1: 8.17
> [...]
> HEAD - With Jack
> 1: 21.22
Wow. These figures are something of an eye-opener.
> experiments - With Jack
> 1: 7.14
I wonder what on earth could have made that 21 -> 7 second difference?
That _reall
On Friday 09 Dec 2005 13:56, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Meanwhile, I've just noticed that the sequencer process appears to be
> leaking about 16MB every time I press Record (MIDI track armed) on a
> file with a few audio segments in it. Uh-oh...
That one's fixed.
Chris
On Friday 09 Dec 2005 10:36, Chris Cannam wrote:
> As for option (b), it would get us an 8-bit QImage which means we
> could have enough colours and still only use a quarter of the current
> memory load, but I have absolutely no idea whether Qt will do the
> right thing when drawing it to an RGB pi
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:05:09 +0100, Chris Cannam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 09 Dec 2005 23:43, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
Who cares, really. I'm mean seriously, they're up to their 4th
iteration of this, and jack and alsa are both so darn frickin' poorly
packaged and complicated to se
On Sunday 11 December 2005 23:51, Chris Cannam wrote:
>
> * No audio recording segment appears during recording. Is this
> something I just broke?
No this is something which Silvan reported a while ago and that I'm fixing
right now.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
-
On Sunday 11 December 2005 21:15, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Any more data on this from anyone else? --
4 or 5 measures in each of the following cases ("manual" measures : precision
= +-1s)
(AMD Athlon 1 GHz, RAM=768k)
head with or without jackd :
- GUI coming up in 5s
- console activity stopped afte
I am a bit fuzzy on who had a laundry list of things to be done to the
guitar chord editor. I would appreciate that list on Thursday. My finals
end on Wednesday so in between now and then I am, well, busy.
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Saturday 10 December 2005 15:05, Chris Cannam wrote:
>
> It's one thing to rant theatrically about systems you personally are
> having trouble with -- I do that too and enjoy it -- but quite another
> to start drawing practical conclusions, like it's not worth even
> talking to those terrible pe
Any more data on this from anyone else? --
On Friday 09 Dec 2005 10:44, Chris Cannam wrote:
> If you have both the CVS HEAD and "experiments" branches available to
> you, or can be bothered to get them:
>
> Can you update both and then compare how long each of them takes to
> start up?
>
> The ex
Hi,
On Sunday 11 December 2005 21:15, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Any more data on this from anyone else? --
Startup times (in seconds) for my workstation (AMD K7 2086.803 MHz, RAM: 1G).
Six measurements for each branch, with and without jackd running.
HEAD - No Jack
1: 8.17
2: 7.42
3: 7.19
4: 7.41
5
10 matches
Mail list logo
