Re: [Rosegarden-devel] [Rosegarden-user] Marker off set to hydrogen

2006-07-18 Thread psykx.out
psykx.out wrote: > D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: >> On Tuesday 11 July 2006 8:04 pm, you wrote: >> >> >>> I mean that the markers >>> >> >> Rulers. That's what confused me. "Markers" are something completely >> different. >> >> >>> at the top and bottom of the "tracks data window"

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new composition dialog

2006-07-18 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 2:47 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > ... well, it depends on the choice. Templates vs what we have now: I > vote templates. Templates and a dialog like the one I described > earlier, vs just the dialog: I vote templates and the dialog. > Templates on their own vs the dialog on

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new composition dialog

2006-07-18 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 18 Jul 2006 19:40, Chris Cannam wrote: > I probably marginally vote against. ... well, it depends on the choice. Templates vs what we have now: I vote templates. Templates and a dialog like the one I described earlier, vs just the dialog: I vote templates and the dialog. Templates

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new composition dialog

2006-07-18 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 18 Jul 2006 18:24, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > On Tuesday, 18 July 2006 18:00, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > > As far as templates vs. some dialog > > I vote for templates, too. I probably marginally vote against. Whenever I try to use a word processor or something that ha

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] Recording filters

2006-07-18 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 17 Jul 2006 23:54, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > What should I do with the "In" combo in the IPB for the Audio > instruments? It is conceptually very similar to the input channel > filter in the TPB, I think. Probably have to leave it alone for 1.3, as I imagine moving it would be tro

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] More controllers allowed

2006-07-18 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 18 Jul 2006 17:58, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > I don't see a way to limit the size of a combo box QWidget::setMaximumWidth should do it, shouldn't it? Chris - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Futu

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new composition dialog

2006-07-18 Thread Chris Cannam
On Tuesday 18 Jul 2006 17:00, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > Noteworthy Composer starts a new composition off by taking you to the > templates directory. You load the "quintet" template, and then it > takes you to the equivalent of Composition -> Edit Document > Properties for you to fill i

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] new composition dialog

2006-07-18 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Tuesday, 18 July 2006 18:00, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > As far as templates vs. some dialog I vote for templates, too. BTW. If I could choose a "voice and piano" template, I would like to see the piano staffs starting with a brace joining them together as it is usual in sheet musi

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] More controllers allowed

2006-07-18 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 11:50 am, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > Don't worry too much about the colors combo, it's not the biggest control > in the TPB, compared to the device combos. Anyway, you can see that there > is some room now at right end of the TPB, but the other parameter boxes are > mu

[Rosegarden-devel] new composition dialog

2006-07-18 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 7:11 am, Chris Cannam wrote: Splitting this off into a separate thread... > The one thing related to this that I can remember discussing with any > conviction was the idea of having a New Composition dialog that allows > you to create a set of staffs for a new score. For

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] More controllers allowed

2006-07-18 Thread Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas
On Tuesday, 18 July 2006 06:34, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > On Monday 17 July 2006 6:45 pm, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas wrote: > > I've found only one real solution: shorter labels. > > I'm dicking around with the color combo to limit it to a certain length of > text, but it doesn't seem to ma

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] progress report, track defaults for new segments

2006-07-18 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 7:11 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > > OK, brace yourself. This is another long one > > Wow, you're not joking! I wish I were better at compressing what I have to say down to just the barest essentials too, but every time I try to do that, my messages don't make any damn sens

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] progress report, track defaults for new segments

2006-07-18 Thread D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 7:11 am, Chris Cannam wrote: >> [continue to edit multiple voices on multiple tracks] > I think that's a fair assumption. If I ever get around to doing the > multi-voice display/edit I've had in mind for after 1.3, then it will > be an optional visual arrangement based on

Re: [Rosegarden-devel] progress report, track defaults for new segments

2006-07-18 Thread Chris Cannam
On Sunday 16 Jul 2006 19:08, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > OK, brace yourself. This is another long one Wow, you're not joking! > > These parameters are purely a set of default values for some other > > parameters of a segment. Right? > > Right, except for the clef, which inserts a clef