Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 14:02:01, Ian Gardner a écrit :
>
> Ah, it sounds like the classic software engineering debate! Does one go
> master-slave or peer-to-peer? svn or git? ITunes or Napster?
>
I hope I didn't start such a debate.
> I guess that whichever approach we hit upon, we'll have to
On Thursday, November 18, 2010, Ian Gardner wrote:
> It therefore seems like some ability to reparent an editor on a replacement
> segment set would be generally useful, not just in the case of linked or
> repeated segments.
The "add layer" command does something similar now. You start with a vi
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 11:25:48, Chris Cannam a écrit :
>
> What happens to the linked copies if you delete the original segment?
>
Currently one of the linked copies (the first one in the list) is promoted to
reference segment.
> I assumed that Ian's "peer-to-peer" approach was intended to
On Thursday, November 18, 2010, Yves Guillemot wrote:
> There is only one approach: Ian's one. Mine never works.
Oh. I've been there before!
> Nothing should change about the transposition and other transformation
> possibilities.
That's easy then.
--
D. Michael McIntyre
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 09:47:28, D. Michael McIntyre a écrit :
>
> This sounds like good news, but at the same time it has me worried about
> the work Ian has in progress.
>
> I'd like to see you two settle on a common approach pretty soon, before
> getting into too much detail work refining
- Original Message
> From: Chris Cannam
>
> I assumed that Ian's "peer-to-peer" approach was intended to avoid the
> problem of having the user keep track of which one was supposed to be
> the original and having to treat it specially. That seemed like an
> attractive feature to me.
>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Yves Guillemot
wrote:
> The original segment if now used as the reference segment and is keeped
> inside the composition.
What happens to the linked copies if you delete the original segment?
I assumed that Ian's "peer-to-peer" approach was intended to avoid the
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010, Yves Guillemot wrote:
> The repeats_and_segment_links branch should show the same behavior than
> linked_segment_ian branch (except the unwanted closing of editors) with, in
> addition, the repeated segments shown in notation editor.
This sounds like good news, bu
I tried to use Ian'implementation of segment links to make repeated segments
visible but found some problems.
In this implementation all visible linked segments are symmetrical. All of
them are looking to a central reference segment which lies in a special
container of the composition and is (cu
I just created a branch to experiment
- on repeating segments (I would like to see them in the notation editor),
- on segment symlinks (they are a way to achieve the preceding goal),
- on repeat volta (maybe segment symlinks can be used to define them).
Please, don't wait to any working result
10 matches
Mail list logo
