William,
I would guess that, following the pattern that appears to be present for
claim submission which i just finished commenting on, routing of the 835 or
277 would not depend so much on the ISA sender as it would on the 1000A
submitter. The 1000B receiver would have to have my "first-hop" add
I'm posting Marcallee's message below to the list for her since for some
reason she has been temporarily prohibited from posting directly.
Rachel
-Original Message-
From: Marcallee Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Bob,
If I can generalize what you are saying, the ISA is truly the envelop to be
delivered, with the name of the interchange addressee on the front (which
certainly fits with the Transmission Control Schematic shown in figure A1 in
appendix A of the 837 IG -- actually, I think its in all IGs in ap
Marcallee and I had the following exchange of thoughts yesterday. We both
agree that perhaps this exchange of ideas might be informative/useful to
this list.
Rachel Foerster
Rachel Foerster & Associates, Ltd.
Phone: 847-872-8070
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Chris:
(1) I don't really think it matters who the sender (ISA06) is identified
as, whether the actual doctor (or clinic) or the business agent (billing
service?). The sender ID in the ISA is probably not going to be used in
any adjudication decision. It's definitely the ID of the route to whic
Chris,
I have edited my responses into your message.
Bob
"Christopher
